Buy Official Merchandise!
Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion
FAQ [CLOSED] ALL THE RULES that'll keep you from being BANNED

Fingerz

Avatar: 22863 2010-11-15 01:15:51 -0500
16

[7 VIBRATING DOLDOES]

Level 35 Emo Kid

A neverhasbeen

MC Banhammer Posted:

New rule (to be added to all RP forums as well, later today):

Posting Log in to see images! dragons in Sticky threads, EVEN IN RP FORUMS, is now bannable.

Of course they’re not allowed in non-RP forums (except for the ones specifically designed for them, in the proper forum) at all.

But we can post draginz from OTHER sites?

AWESOME.

Fingerz edited this message on 02/05/2009 12:23PM

MC Banhammer

Avatar: 1887 2011-07-31 00:40:59 -0400
36

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Troll

Trying to create drama to drum up the ratings by any means necessary!

Fingerz Posted:

But we can post draginz from OTHER sites?

AWESOME.

Don’t be a wisebum. You know what I mean.

Fingerz

Avatar: 22863 2010-11-15 01:15:51 -0500
16

[7 VIBRATING DOLDOES]

Level 35 Emo Kid

A neverhasbeen

MC Banhammer Posted:

Don’t be a wisebum. You know what I mean.

Aw come on- if I don’t give you a hard time, someone else is gonna have to do it Log in to see images!

OrsonScottCa-
rd

Avatar: 104768 2015-08-05 14:57:49 -0400
39

[Forumwarz Speakeasy]

Level 69 Hacker

Why do I keep coming back here

MC Banhammer Posted:

New rule (to be added to all RP forums as well, later today):

Posting dragcave dragons in Sticky threads, EVEN IN RP FORUMS, is now bannable.

Of course they’re not allowed in non-RP forums (except for the ones specifically designed for them, in the proper forum) at all.

THANK GOD. Banhammer, you may be my new favorite person.

Does this mean mods will clean up the ones that are already there?

DOPE-HARDCOR-
E-0

Avatar: DOPE-HARDCORE-0's Avatar
2

[Team Shortbus]

Level 37 Troll

ALSO A male reproductive organSUCKING ****WAD

MC Banhammer Posted:

New rule (to be added to all RP forums as well, later today):

Posting dragcave dragons in Sticky threads, EVEN IN RP FORUMS, is now bannable.

Of course they’re not allowed in non-RP forums (except for the ones specifically designed for them, in the proper forum) at all.

And what’s the word on dragons that people hide behind tinyurl?

MC Banhammer

Avatar: 1887 2011-07-31 00:40:59 -0400
36

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Troll

Trying to create drama to drum up the ratings by any means necessary!

OrsonScottCard Posted:

Does this mean mods will clean up the ones that are already there?

Yep.

DOPE-HARDCORE-0 Posted:

And what’s the word on dragons that people hide behind tinyurl?

Those are still dragcave dragons. Same rules apply.

MC Banhammer edited this message on 02/05/2009 12:31PM

Possibly a C-
abbage

Avatar: 76887 Fri Oct 24 03:39:44 -0400 2008
9

[Leafy Green Vegeta-
bles
]

Level 35 Hacker

Herbaceous, biennial, dicotyledonous , and flowering.

DOPE-HARDCORE-0 Posted:

And what’s the word on dragons that people hide behind tinyurl?

Don’t post them in sticky threads.

DOPE-HARDCOR-
E-0

Avatar: DOPE-HARDCORE-0's Avatar
2

[Team Shortbus]

Level 37 Troll

ALSO A male reproductive organSUCKING ****WAD

Possibly a Cabbage Posted:

Don’t post them in sticky threads.

I mean in general, in any thread. I don’t see any reason why I should have to adblock individual tinyurl links, or tinyurl at the domain level, just because people are trying to get around adblock.

MC Banhammer

Avatar: 1887 2011-07-31 00:40:59 -0400
36

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Troll

Trying to create drama to drum up the ratings by any means necessary!

DOPE-HARDCORE-0 Posted:

I mean in general, in any thread. I don’t see any reason why I should have to adblock individual tinyurl links, or tinyurl at the domain level, just because people are trying to get around adblock.

That is not currently in the ban rules. Please don’t discuss that issue here, there are plenty of other places to do it.

Fingerz

Avatar: 22863 2010-11-15 01:15:51 -0500
16

[7 VIBRATING DOLDOES]

Level 35 Emo Kid

A neverhasbeen

DOPE-HARDCORE-0 Posted:

I mean in general, in any thread. I don’t see any reason why I should have to adblock individual tinyurl links, or tinyurl at the domain level, just because people are trying to get around adblock.

You should probably take THAT topic to another thread or maybe even make a new one for it.

SG94

Avatar: 53266 2011-07-31 00:43:01 -0400
20

[SG Inc]

Level 35 Troll

The most anal, compulsive tattle tale on this site, mess with me and meet the ban axe ****

Any particular reason to have rules about dragons in RP forums? They don’t seem to fit in with the other rules regarding shock/browser hijacking etc. They’re pretty annoying to some, but that’s kind of the point innit? You troll with them on RP forums which explicitly allow that sort of behaviour.

It’s just a very mild form of spam/trolling. They’re very small, non-obtrusive, non-offensive images. Why should it not be allowed in RP?

Possibly a C-
abbage

Avatar: 76887 Fri Oct 24 03:39:44 -0400 2008
9

[Leafy Green Vegeta-
bles
]

Level 35 Hacker

Herbaceous, biennial, dicotyledonous , and flowering.

SG94 Posted:

Any particular reason to have rules about dragons in RP forums? They don’t seem to fit in with the other rules regarding shock/browser hijacking etc. They’re pretty annoying to some, but that’s kind of the point innit? You troll with them on RP forums which explicitly allow that sort of behaviour.

It’s just a very mild form of spam/trolling. They’re very small, non-obtrusive, non-offensive images. Why should it not be allowed in RP?

I think the idea is just that “Sticky threads in RP forums are a tiny island of ‘there are actually rules here’” and so spamming/trolling the sticky threads is frowned upon.

I would be happier if the rule was just “spamming images in a sticky thread, even in an RP forum is a bannable offense”, but I imagine that will happen if people start spamming gay porn or whatnot in the stickies.

Alternatively, if the sticky threads were just moderated like Non-RP that wouldn’t be a bad thing. The point of the sticky threads is that people should actually read them.

Possibly a Cabbage edited this message on 02/05/2009 2:59PM

MC Banhammer

Avatar: 1887 2011-07-31 00:40:59 -0400
36

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Troll

Trying to create drama to drum up the ratings by any means necessary!

SG94 Posted:

Any particular reason to have rules about dragons in RP forums? They don’t seem to fit in with the other rules regarding shock/browser hijacking etc. They’re pretty annoying to some, but that’s kind of the point innit? You troll with them on RP forums which explicitly allow that sort of behaviour.

The reasoning is that there are some threads (for exmaple, the Camwhore stickies) where the original intent of the forums (in this case, posting camwhore pics like camwhores do) are relatively intact. Trolls making fun of the pics is one thing, but dragon spam, well, that just doesn’t “feel” right in a definitive Camwhore thread.

I believe I’ve cleaned up all the posts, and the READMEs all point back to the OP in this thread which I’ve updated. If anyone finds more dragcave dragons in RP stickies, please use the report tool to report them. Thx.

-MLF-

Avatar: 83146 Sun Jan 18 18:56:12 -0500 2009
6

Level 60 Hacker

“Cracking Addict”

MC Banhammer Posted:

New rule (to be added to all RP forums as well, later today):

Posting dragcave dragons in Sticky threads, EVEN IN RP FORUMS, is now bannable.

Of course they’re not allowed in non-RP forums (except for the ones specifically designed for them, in the proper forum) at all.

Wait, so people are allowed posting lines and lines of gay porn in stickies, but not a single line of dragons?

Proof: http://forumwarz.com/discussions/view/16198-4m-rulez

fsdgsdfjijnkn y8 gui’s post is acceptable, BlankTH’s quote is acceptable, yet, Dragonoth’s post is bannable?


All the first 2 posts do is severely slow down the forum, by posting line after line of an image, whereas the dragons are just advertising for another game. True that dragons have been needlessly spammed, but are they really worse?

Just my opinion, also, I bumume dragons are still allowed in sigs?

Fingerz

Avatar: 22863 2010-11-15 01:15:51 -0500
16

[7 VIBRATING DOLDOES]

Level 35 Emo Kid

A neverhasbeen

Should just ban ALL SPAM in board rules stickies.

It would be fair.

OrsonScottCa-
rd

Avatar: 104768 2015-08-05 14:57:49 -0400
39

[Forumwarz Speakeasy]

Level 69 Hacker

Why do I keep coming back here

Fingerz Posted:

Should just ban ALL SPAM in board rules stickies.

It would be fair.

Agreed. I find myself agreeing a lot with Fingerz lately. It scares me a little.

Possibly a C-
abbage

Avatar: 76887 Fri Oct 24 03:39:44 -0400 2008
9

[Leafy Green Vegeta-
bles
]

Level 35 Hacker

Herbaceous, biennial, dicotyledonous , and flowering.

Fingerz Posted:

Should just ban ALL SPAM in board rules stickies.

It would be fair.

Agreed.

Edit: The point of stickies is that people should read them. When a sticky is filled with spam, who’s going to read them? Particularly, when relevant information exists in places other than the first post.

Possibly a Cabbage edited this message on 02/05/2009 4:21PM

MC Banhammer

Avatar: 1887 2011-07-31 00:40:59 -0400
36

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Troll

Trying to create drama to drum up the ratings by any means necessary!

MeatLoafFan Posted:

I bumume dragons are still allowed in sigs?

Yes.

Fingerz Posted:

Should just ban ALL SPAM in board rules stickies.

It would be fair.

Actually, the rules stickies were just a bonus. In those threads all the pertinent information is in the OPs. It’s the non-rules stickies which were suffering.

As to the question “Why dragons and not page-breaking stuff?” Honestly, because of the overuse. If the stickies were being slammed with any other particular type of trolling, those too would come up for discussion about removal in those locations.

We used to have a rule about repeated images, but it was removed. I’d hate to have to bring it back.

SG94

Avatar: 53266 2011-07-31 00:43:01 -0400
20

[SG Inc]

Level 35 Troll

The most anal, compulsive tattle tale on this site, mess with me and meet the ban axe ****

MC Banhammer Posted:

If the stickies were being slammed with any other particular type of trolling, those too would come up for discussion about removal in those locations.

So trolling is not allowed in RP?

NecroKickbum

Avatar: Ashtray

[WeChall]

Level 37 Troll

“Problem Child IV”

Log in to see images!

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!