wilD-****22 Posted:

also there was nothing in the rules about NOT agreeing to more rules, so that point is moot. especially since you decided to offer that new rule.

im done now, its up to trout.

And when did you agree to the new rule?

Seriously, dude, it was a simple trap, and when you didn’t reply to it, even to ‘agree’ to the new rule, I figured that you saw right through it. I bumumed that you knew I was trying to trick you, and were too smart for that.

I must have overestimated you.

But, in all honesty, if Evil Trout rules that you broke rule #2, then I’m going to tell him that you qualify for the Bounty Hunter reward.

I did not have any authority to change any rules after the contest began. So the contest is now, officially over, has been for a few hours now. You will either win 5 or 10 BP.

In the end, it’s just a matter of whether you were my nickel-per-hour or dime-per-hour puppet. But you were a paid puppet, either way.

Czarnian bumbumin Posted:

And when did you agree to the new rule?

Seriously, dude, it was a simple trap, and when you didn’t reply to it, even to ‘agree’ to the new rule, I figured that you saw right through it. I bumumed that you knew I was trying to trick you, and were too smart for that.

I must have overestimated you.

But, in all honesty, if Evil Trout rules that you broke rule #2, then I’m going to tell him that you qualify for the Bounty Hunter reward.

I did not have any authority to change any rules after the contest began. So the contest is now, officially over, has been for a few hours now. You will either win 5 or 10 BP.

In the end, it’s just a matter of whether you were my nickel-per-hour or dime-per-hour puppet. But you were a paid puppet, either way.

you said i may discuss the rules with you here, in the interests of ‘fairness’, now all of a sudden it isnt a rule because i did wish to discuss them, since you lied and said there was proof i broke the rules?

that is an utter pile of bull****.

also, by your own statement there, you have just admitted i won, ‘5 or 10 bp’. i stuck to your rules, its just that simple, no matter how you try to twist them to get out of it. as for the puppet thing, it really looks like you guys are to puppets, to me, considering how you were willing to pay me to go away. not to mention all the attention i seem to be worth, to all of your little clan. if trout rules in your favor on this last attempt to weasel out of it, i will be shocked, since i have quite clearly followed your rules. if that actually does happen, maybe you will even get lucky and i will give up on this game, because i can handle injustice and bs from you and your type, but not from someone at the top of the totem pole like trout is. thats all for now.

BirdofPrey Posted:

i quote this as proof that wild **** 22 broke the rules. looking forward to my bp

Evil Trout will be reviewing this soon, I think. I will ask him to decide whether wild-**** can claim the Bounty for ‘turning himself in’. But considering how much Wild-**** is arguing that he didn’t break any rules (when clear logic shows, yes, he most certainly did), he may not qualify for the Bounty. I mean, you can’t turn yourself in, present proof of your crime, and then plead ‘Not Guilty’ during your trial, right?

My thoughts on this is that wild-**** needs to either

A) Stick to his current position that he didn’t break any rules and hope for the 10 BP

or

B) Conceded that he did indeed break the rules, and accept the 5 BP Bounty Reward.

I think if he decides to stick with Option A, then he shouldn’t be allowed to potentially claim Option B.

So, here’s my official offer, Wild-****:

Either admit that you broke the original, official rules & take a 5 BP Bounty Reward, or, try to convince Evil Trout that you won the contest and either get 10 BP or nothing at all.

Do you take the guaranteed, easy 5 BPs, or do you risk it all and hope that Evil Trout rules inyour favor?

FIVE BP guaranteed or risk all TEN BP and possibly walk away with nothing.

Well, nothing but your shame, that is.

What’s your decision, Wild-****?

BirdofPrey Posted:

newcomb’s paradox

Yup, pretty damn close. Very similar situation.

wilD-****22 Posted:

i stuck to all your ‘rules’, very clearly. the way you try to twist your own rules around and even break them, to make it look as if somehow I’M the one at fault, shows how pointless it is to discuss any of them with you, any further. you are dishonorable.

make your choice

Hi guys. I’ve just submitted myself to the torture of reading through this entire thread.

I’m still not entirely sure about who “turned wilD-****22 in.” I don’t have evidence of that either way. I’m also not sure this guenwhyever character. Was there any admission that they were a multi?

As for the reward: It’s ultimately up to ET, but it’s my bumessment that wilD-****22 would be better off taking the 5 BP.

Czarnian bumbumin pulled a rotten (but clever) move on you. And this being a role-playing subforum, I’m going to say it’s kosher. If his methodology wasn’t as airtight, if he wasn’t committed to paying out BP at all, and if he were to deny the original target (you) any of the BP offered, I’d say it violates the spirit of the contest. But if you can get 5 BP out of it, I’d say take it.

Jalapeno Bootyhole Posted:

Hi guys. I’ve just submitted myself to the torture of reading through this entire thread.

You’re a braver man than I. I only read through all this because I had to do so.

I’m still not entirely sure about who “turned wilD-****22 in.” I don’t have evidence of that either way. I’m also not sure this guenwhyever character. Was there any admission that they were a multi?

No, not really. We weren’t sure about whether or not guenwhyever was a multi or not, one way or the other, but figured it was worth a shot either way. Just simply accusing guenwhyever was a tactic to see if wild-**** would take that bait as well.

All through this contest, we were trying to figure out ways to bait Wild-**** into breaking a rule. Heck, the Bounty Hunter rule made it pretty clear that we would be actively hunting for Wild-****. We even discussed faking a screenshot from IDC, but I thought that would be going too far.

As far as who turned Wild-**** in, Bird of Prey was the first person to ‘quote’ Wild-****’s post that broke rule #2. And I would say that Wild-****, if he agreed that he broke rule #2, would count as turning in evidence on himself.

As for the reward: It’s ultimately up to ET, but it’s my bumessment that wilD-****22 would be better off taking the 5 BP.

I completely agree.

Czarnian bumbumin pulled a rotten (but clever) move on you. And this being a role-playing subforum, I’m going to say it’s kosher. If his methodology wasn’t as airtight, if he wasn’t committed to paying out BP at all, and if he were to deny the original target (you) any of the BP offered, I’d say it violates the spirit of the contest. But if you can get 5 BP out of it, I’d say take it.

Thank you. I appreciate that someone gets what I was going for here.

There’s a difference between a dirty trick and an illegal move.

One man’s dirty trick is another man’s brilliant tactic.

Log in to see images!

male reproductive organ Liquor Posted:

Please enlighten me: What’s so significant about a little **** like Wild**** that TSB give him so much attention?Log in to see images!

i think the main problem is theres a shortage of really terrible people to go after so when one shows up we’re pretty rabid.

Vagitarian Posted:

Needs more pain.jpg

you sure are a good poster