You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
BINGEBOT 2015's Flamebate Posts
View BINGEBOT 2015's Profile
Search Results | ||
---|---|---|
![]() |
Domination Enhancements Threadspacekadt Posted:
This is my thinking too.. anyways, updated OP with all the proposed changes. I’m going to think about these in depth and figure out what to push forward at next weeks meeting so in the mean time, convince me which are the best changes! Log in to see images!
Keep in mind, I hope to push all of these.. it’s just a matter of figuring out which one’s to push first. (view post) |
12/04/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements ThreadSo. As someone had mentioned earlier, it is unlikely that we’d be able to do both the Raid changes as well as the Alt changes at the same time.
As such I’d consider pushing one initiative ahead of the others.. and here are the options as I see them:
– Raid changes: Limit X characters per raid; each character can only join 1 raid per day; if you’re not in the raid, you can’t affect the count positively; can only join the raid in the first x minutes; (again, don’t worry about the 37 scoops.. as I mentioned, we build the infrastructure, then adjust the balance to make it work) – Alt changes: Allow only X characters to participate in dom each week; it would likely auto-select the first 5 characters to earn scoops that week; outstanding characters can’t be marked as pwning forums; no alts in the same bracket – Dom changes: # medals available in a bracket are relative to scoops produced in that bracket; no alts in the same bracket
Pick one and I’ll push it forward.. I’d been pushing the Raid changes cause they are easier to implement. But if there’s a larger problem around alts, let’s discuss and push that instead.
Thoughts?
Also, updated OP. (view post) |
12/04/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements ThreadSo… instead of doing all the proposed changes, we should just not allow alts to play Dom? Or limit the number of alts? (view post) |
12/03/2008 |
![]() |
ET refuses blowjobs!Wylin Posted:
Do I really have to answer that question? The internet is a fantastic and wondrous place! Log in to see images! (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
ET refuses blowjobs!Physics Posted:
01001001001001110110110001101100001000000111001101101000011011110110111101110100 00100000010110010100111101010101010100100010000001100101011110010110010100100000 011011110111010101110100 (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
ET refuses blowjobs!raepp d0g11 Posted: (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
ET refuses blowjobs!Raepdog Posted:
ok I’m fairly new to this.. open wide and tell me how badly you want it.. Log in to see images! (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
ET refuses blowjobs!So even though I may DESERVE one, he’s not giving. Anyone else want a shot…? ...in the face? (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements Threadplk Posted:
Yeah raid interruption is good in theory, but may not work in practice. I never promised raid interruption benefits Log in to see images! (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements Threadspacekadt Posted:
Yeah I’m ok with this too. Which is why an alt limit is also mentioned in the OP. Also, we can look into raid interruption later after we fix what’s not working with today’s configuration. (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements Threadmeeeeeeeeee Posted:
Yes we could certainly look into a reward for raid interruption. But we have to careful or users could just form two raids with their alts and interrupt themselves. Half the scoops is an ok reward.. Something like every 2 forums you pwn back from a raid you get 1 scoop for.. Sure, I’d consider that. (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements Threadplk Posted:
Yeah perhaps.. so take pistachio out of the equation and make raid vanilla worth 2 scoops each. Or something.. Again, once the mechanic is built we can tweak the balance, just like the rest of forumwarz. (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements Threadplk Posted:
With a smaller raid groups though it should be easier to get 10 (or less if you include alts) users to work together on a raid, and maintain your pistachio scoops. I do think that more raid, more often, that are less time consuming would be better for all involved.
Then we could even do “raid” weeks for a domination theme, where the raid limited is higher.. or lifted.. or klan vanilla yields 2 scoops instead of 1.. once the game is more balanced we should be able to experiment a little bit more and encourage raiding! More raiding klans is a good thing in my books. (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements ThreadAdeptus Posted:
I covertly raided with a klan recently and was able to get plenty of pistachios. Depending on your klans strategy you can easily work in pistachio. Lemon is a bit harder and risks loss of vanilla. I figured you might be able to get 6 lemon out of your 12 visits.. that might be generous. Even then, we’re only talking about 6 scoops.
Back in the day I used to be able to get 36 lemons, 9 vanilla and about 20 pistachio for a standard solo run.. whereas with raiding I could have gotten 300+ vanilla.. Good ol’ SotQR Log in to see images!
Anyways, point is, these changes would help bridge the gap with vanilla and allow us to balance things accordingly, instead of just giving more scoops for solo raidings, which is what we did in the short term to address the gap. (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements Threadplk Posted:
Ok well see my example above.. as I mentioned once the infrastructure is set up, we can make balance adjustments as needed.
That being said I see your point about alts. And to that effect alts won’t be able to get that many medals if we implement the other rule in the OP:
– Medals: The number of goals available be relative to the TOTAL number of scoops earned by all characters in a bracket. That way, the more active a bracket, the more medals there are to go around. And you can’t drop down to inactive brackets to get tons of easy medals. 0-50 (Most Scoops), 51-100 (Most Scoops, Highest Min Scoops), 101-150 (Most Scoops, Highest Min Scoops, Fibonacci), 151-200 (Most Scoops, Highest Min Scoops, Fibonacci Sequence, Most Scoops Destroyed), etc, etc..
Let’s say we do the above.. and we define the golden rule: “You no alts/mains can be in the same group” this could solve the problem and stop alts from dropping down to inactive brackets and getting 4 medals!
Or we could just get rid of ties again. I would consider ties a temporary fix while we adjust vanilla anyways.
Alts are definitely an issue, which is why I’m also considering limiting the number of alts that can participate in Domination. I don’t think that’s the best solution. But I don’t think that forcing alts into different brackets is either, cause you’ll get forced into inactive brackets where you can get every medal available!
Again, suggestions are welcome.. (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements ThreadAdeptus Posted:
How about we nerf solo vanilla back to 1 scoop like it used to be.. and we allow alts back into raids..
I still stand by the fact that raiding should be better than solo, but it shouldn’t keep solo players from playing. So some math…
Situation A – solo vanilla run
12 visits. Let’s bumume I get 2 lemon for each.. and sure, we’ll use your number 50 pistachio. If solo vanilla is nerfed back to 1 scoop I would get 9 vanilla scoops. 24 lemon. So total of 83 scoops. Mostly pistachio.
Situation B – klan raid
120 visits. Fair to bumume no lemon, but let’s say you’ll get 6 out of your 12 visits, because. We can use the same number for pistachio, cause it’s likely you can do both, so 50 pistachio. If you can get 109 vanilla, that’s 165 scoops. So you’d get double for doing a raid.
That looks pretty good on paper to me. We want to adjust it? Make solo vanilla worth 2 instead of 1.. or 3 instead of 1…
Again, I’m just saying there are options when it comes to vanilla.
Maybe I’m missing something here.. am I? (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements Threadspacekadt Posted:
Screw that! No more gaming the system! Log in to see images! The rules are there for a reason.. to give raiders enough of an advantage to merit raiding, but to not give them guaranteed medals, which is essentially the case today. So once these are in place we can look to balance the limit, or the solo vanilla yield.. but at least with this approach Domination should be a lot more competitive and encourage smaller and more raids.. and hopefully get more solo players to raid, because it’s quick, easy and yields more scoops.
When I say “quick” and “easy” I mean, quick and easy compared to today.. which is all about how many alts you have an how much time you’re willing to devote. I don’t think that’s the way it should be. This should be a game about strategy and cooperation. IMO. (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements Threadspacekadt Posted:
We could also just nerf solo vanilla (like I suggested in my previous post). Also I’m considering putting a limit on when you can join a raid (ex: you can only join in the first 5 minutes). That way you couldn’t cycle characters into and out of a raid.
With all these changes I don’t really see a need for a raid time limit cap.. we might just get rid of it. The cap was put in place so that one character couldn’t join and sit for hours while other members push forums. With a limit in space you wouldn’t want leeches in your raids anyways.. I would bumume Log in to see images! (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements Threadplk Posted:
Agreed. However, with these changes raids will be restricted to 120 visits (lets call it that for argument sake). Therefore they won’t last for hours. Many users can run multiple smaller (and faster raids). This should make raiding as a whole more common then solo raiding. And with only requiring 10 characters instead of however many contribute now, it would be easier to coordinate. Perhaps we could adjust the yield of solo vanilla to 7 or 6 per dom (so 63 or 54 scoops instead of 72).
The point is, smaller raids, which are easier to coordinate and execute should result in more raids, more competition, and more strategy overall, because you wouldn’t have a windfall of scoops, you’d have an edge over solo players. An edge.
I don’t want domination to be about who has more alts and who can spend more time raiding. I want it to be about strategy and to encourage cooperation.
plk Posted:
Agreed, but this is, and always has been true.. but if you look at the top choco earners, they aren’t the one’s dominating the game.. the vanilla raiders are. If we nerf vanilla scoops and choco (or other scoop earners) become the kings, we’ll make adjustments to keep them in check.
Again, other suggestions/alternatives are welcome. That’s why I post these types of changes publicly. (view post) |
12/02/2008 |
![]() |
Domination Enhancements Threadplk Posted:
Solo vanilla can also be interfered with and is much more costly (you’d lose 8 scoops with every interference, you only lose 1 with klan raiding). Also, maybe raid limit of 10 isn’t the right number, maybe it’s 15.. once the logic is built, we can tweak the balance.
There is always the option to get scoops through other methods, and there’s nothing stopping anyone from doing that now, so I would consider that a different discussion. At this point it’s fair to say that raiding vanilla has too much of an advantage over solo vanilla. That is the problem I am trying to address. If you have other suggestions speak now. These changes are in the pipe and will get implemented in due time.
Alts in the same bracket is another issue which perhaps requires more thought, however with more people playing, and with a more competitive chance for solo players, chances are alts won’t have the medals to end up in the same bracket as the main. And if they do, then they’d likely have to keep getting medals to stay in the top group anyways. (view post) |
12/02/2008 |