generichaxor Posted:

whenever i set up a serious debate,

ppl come in, flame me, and then the thread falls apart

my friend contest isn’t getting many posts

http://www.forumwarz.com/discussions/view/19038

my religion thread fell apart after shrtcat started his own

http://www.forumwarz.com/discussions/view/19525

my censorship thread never got any posts

http://www.forumwarz.com/discussions/view/19575

my capital punishment thread isn’t getting many posts either

http://www.forumwarz.com/discussions/view/19578

so this is my newest attempt

dead threads are no fun

People shouldn’t be flaming in here. It’s NOT a RPG forum. I’m surprised that the mods didn’t ban all their bumes. Log in to see images!

Pavilion Posted:

It’s like Russian roulette except with a semi-automatic and your orgasm at stake.

ooohhh… hot AND risky

generichaxor Posted:

destruction of animals?

u dont need to kill the original animal to get a clone…

I believe he was aiming at that it would make sex obsolete, so Christians would support it. I don’t agree, but just trying to clarify.

generichaxor Posted:

however, stats i read somewhere showed that some cloned organisms have shorter life expectancies than the originals

kind of odd…

so cloning may not completely eliminate the need for sex

i do NOT mean mewtwo and his crew of clones

Paramecium tetraurelia mutant gene causes this. It’s recessive, so doesn’t always cause a shorter life span.

Sex better NOT become obsolete. Society as we know it would crumble since its foundation is sex/sex appeal.

BritishSevenfold Posted:

Sex better NOT become obsolete. Society as we know it would crumble since its foundation is sex/sex appeal.

If u haven’t read Orwell’s 1984, don’t read below…

———————————————————————————-

in 1984, the Party tried to eliminate sex

yet Winston and Julia were still inclined to have sex

due to basic human inclinations

(things that not even the Party can suppress yet… )

that was a book (idealistic situations)

eliminating sex in reality would be even worse since there are a lot more than 2 potential anomalies

EDIT: is there a way to make the stupid smileys NEVER appear?

generichaxor Posted:

Cloning is used for scientific purposes to create living copies of organisms.

The major concern with scientific research is the potential damage to the test subjects. Cloning allows scientists to study an organism without harming the original.

Thus, a clone is beneficial to scientific research.

it’s still unethical to damage your test subjects whether they are clones or not, retard. idiocy like this is why many scientist still oppose human cloning, because they know that retards would consider them second clbum citizens, presumably for “lack of a soul”, and probably treat them as slaves.

dobnits Posted:

I believe cloning is our friend.

it is our friend as long as

1. we don’t harm the original

2. we get a useful copy

3. this copy is not misused

4. the original is not misused

as mentioned above, cloning hot women = epic win

Raepdog Posted:

Yes because America is a country that attacks buildings with planes for religion, starts three crusades for religion, burns thousands ont he stake for religion, impales tens of thousands on pikes for religion, slaughtered thousands of philistines for religion… the list goes on.

When did it become fashionable to hate America?

i dont think its fashionable to hate America

America just sets itself up to be hated

(i am an american, so don’t troll me about being anti-America)

Raepdog Posted:

Your a pinko.

We give more charity than any other country, we cured ****ing polio, we ****ing obliterated smallpox, we killed the nazi’s, we are a great nation. The world is ungrateful its always America your so dumb oh wait please save my ****ty country we cant take care of ourselves. Or America your economy sucks of wait were so dependent on you were roasting in our own fiscal hell.

the way you used the word “you” and “we” makes it seem like i hate america…

not true at all