OverclockedJesus Posted:

Problem for you is that I don’t, whereas you do feel that theft is humanitarian and governments can make up the rules of economics as they go along.

I can only bumume that you mean I am arguing in favor of governments and all that they stand for (utter evil apparently?), despite my claim in several posts that I am an anarchist. My claim in this specific argument was that “Government in charge” > “Corporation in charge”, as well as the idea that a power structure in a power void (corporation with a lack of government for example) will become a governing body unto itself. Feel free to remember my position before making baseless accusations.

OverclockedJesus Posted:

The rest of your whining has been snipped. In the future, do try not to throw a tantrum as a substitute for real discourse. And do learn what an ad hominem is; prattling on about it when you don’t know what it is makes you look rather foolish.

Ad Hominem is when you attack the person not the argument. I accused you of being a male reproductive organ rather than saying anything about your argument (not even trying to make discourse at this point) and as for yourself

OverclockedJesus Posted:

Feel free to get some intellectual integrity. I will say that you at least made an effort—right up until you got too close to your core beliefs. Then you pulled a Brave Sir Robin.

That sounds like insulting my integrity and calling me a coward. I tried to argue from multiple points and do not recall backpedaling at all, but feel free to find somewhere I did.

Flailing about like a jackbum AFTER the whole thing was done could be considered flawed integrity, however I had already stepped away so that’s a discussion in and of itself right there as to whether or not it applies.