SG94 Posted:

Could you at least give a semi-serious answer on why this change was necessary? Is it your personal taste? Two or three people whining about sigs? It seems like you fixed a non-existant problem while there have been major gamewrecking bugs in place for months. How did this get priority?

Why don’t you think of it this way: It wasn’t so much a “change” or a “fix” as it was simply tweaking the values to be closer to what they were intended to be the first time we limited sigs. In other words, they were too ****ing big before we limited them, and they remained too ****ing big after we limited them. As far as I’m concerned, they’re still pretty goddamn mother****ing big…unlike the majority of the posters’ male reproductive organes (I bumume).

Anyway, I’m sure you can find a clever way to express your trollhood without having a sig that takes up the entire screen. Even though this is a game about trolling, it should still look realistic. And most forums don’t allow ridiculously giganticized signatures.

Also, this was a fairly easy fix, and therefore it did not overtake the priority of more serious bugs. Besides, as the old saying goes, “Sig-reducing delayed is sig-reducing denied.”

Log in to see images!