You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
INCIT Meta-moderation
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Recommend adding a link “this is spam” to each entry in INCIT. In a given round, a player can either vote for a winner or cite spam, not both. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/04/2009 2:12PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View fuzzyeric's Profile
|
#
  |
||||||
|
open for so much abuse |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/04/2009 2:14PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View cya's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Chawin Posted: You don’t know which entry is each person’s so the most it could be abused is reporting spam. And that could be bannable. Also, stop trying to improve incit or the Hall of **** will be no more.
|
||||||
| Posted On: 10/04/2009 2:19PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View DarkDespair5's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Will incit be any fun to play anymore? Log in to see images! DarkDespair5 edited this message on 10/04/2009 2:31PM |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/04/2009 2:20PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View DarkDespair5's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
you dont have to gice anyone a vote if you citea an entry ads spam, this is agreat way to stop people from dumpvoting Log in to see images! |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/04/2009 11:46PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW...'s Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Should we rename the “Hall of ****” to “Hall of INCIT submissions that recieved the most votes in a round and thus won their owner a chocolate scoop”? |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/04/2009 11:53PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Skyman747's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
DarkDespair5 Posted:
I agree with Chawin, even if you review it regularly that idea’s still an easy way for people to cheat subtly. If used sparingly and only when crucial, you could slip through the radar, especially if you made good edits with it also.
And if you’ve played INCIT often, you can generally get a read on who a person is by how they write things. So, yeah it’s not entirely anonymous either.
That being said, INCIT should be improved. The hall of **** will always be ****ty. We just want higher quality ****. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/05/2009 4:21AM |
Rate this Post: 0
View dragonchips's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
dragonchips Posted:
More fibre needed, imo. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/05/2009 5:32AM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Sarcasm Inc's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Too open for exploits, and will put a much unnecessary stream to the moderators.
Also this will solve nothing. Player police never solves stuff from my experience. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/05/2009 7:27AM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Fran's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Fran Posted:
Says someone who has never been a forumwarz moderator so has no idea how the mods react, as we an see, most players get banned when posts are reported. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/05/2009 7:39AM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Raepdog's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Raepdog Posted:
People who abuse the report spam tool also get banned (see FalconFour).
But 10 people going hellbent on reporting every INCIT win will cause a lot of trouble for all the mods.
Don’t post if you don’t have any good points and you only want to mindlessly flame. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/05/2009 8:07AM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Fran's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Raepdog Posted: There’s actually a lot of reports that we look at, review, and then decide that it’s not really ban worthy. Rough estimate, maybe about 70-80% of reports are deemed ‘less than banworthy’. Some of those, we may still send a TM with a ‘suggestion’, others we just close & save after review. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/05/2009 8:10AM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Sergeant Cid's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Fran Posted:
Turns out this is exactly the model Slashdot (http://slashdot.org) uses to self-police its article discussion system. They’ve also implemented a second layer of moderation (meta-moderation) to get random sampling review of upvoting/downvoting by other people who have self-policed.
I’m not suggesting the second layer of stuff, here. It’s pointless to add complexity without testing simple. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 8:33PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View fuzzyeric's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
