You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
God doesn't exist you fools.
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OverclockedJesus Posted:
There couldn’t be segmented, separate backdrops? What about the models of our universe suggesting the universe itself wraps around in a complex pattern when you reach the endpoints, simulating infinity? DarkDespair5 edited this message on 12/07/2008 10:02PM |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 9:59PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View DarkDespair5's Profile
|
#
  |
||||||
|
DarkDespair5 Posted: How would they interact? As for the universe wrapping around on itself, that simply means the universe is finite and non-bounded. OverclockedJesus edited this message on 12/07/2008 10:06PM |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:01PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View OverclockedJesus...'s Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
OverclockedJesus Posted:
what? apparently you know all the answers to basic questions about existence and the universe, i’m just saying maybe you should spread the wealth, submit your theories and such |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:01PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View BirdofPrey's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
If you viewed a square and a circle along the z-axis, they would look identical. If I told you one of them was a square circle, could you prove me wrong? I know you could offer definitions to prove me wrong, but could you actually confirm that I hadn’t drawn a square circle? Could you actually know without seeing it from all directions, without being able to fully observe it? |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:03PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Indiana Jonas's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
BirdofPrey Posted: Just saying that you clearly think that I think that I know all the answers. I’m just wondering where I said that. Because, you know, I haven’t. And I’ve never claimed it.
So why don’t you take your over-reaction and go find a place to rage against your own epic fail. |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:03PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View OverclockedJesus...'s Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Hobart Bliggity Posted: Squares and circles are 2D, not 3D. Try again. |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:04PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View OverclockedJesus...'s Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
OverclockedJesus Posted:
If you can set arbitrary constraints on the universe I can break them and set my own. Answer the damn question. |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:05PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Indiana Jonas's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
OverclockedJesus Posted:
oh i dunno maybe it was the past 50 posts where you’ve so glibly uttered, with complete certainty, statements about existence and the universe that you may as well have pulled out of your bum? |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:05PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View BirdofPrey's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
OverclockedJesus Posted: He means rotating these 2D shapes in a 3D field so that they both look linear.
|
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:06PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View DarkDespair5's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Hobart Bliggity Posted: I’m not. Please don’t try to impose your fantasy on the universe.
|
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:06PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View OverclockedJesus...'s Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
DarkDespair5 Posted:
He knows, he’s just dodging again. |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:07PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Indiana Jonas's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
OverclockedJesus Posted:
How is a circle not still a circle when viewed from the side? What arbitrary rules are you following? |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:07PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Indiana Jonas's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Other than the “Oh **** I dont know how to answer that I’ll just make something up to change the subject” rules. |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:08PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Indiana Jonas's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
DarkDespair5 Posted: Irrelevant, though, especially since they are 2D shapes with specific definitions. I want to see how he can make a square circle, given that the definitions of each preclude it. Clearly, you can’t have something be both an equilateral quadrilateral with all interior angles as right angles and also be the locus of all points equidistant from a central point at the same time. It’s just not possible.
|
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:08PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View OverclockedJesus...'s Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
OverclockedJesus Posted:
Hobart Bliggity Posted: |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:09PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Indiana Jonas's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Hobart Bliggity Posted: Because we’re talking about the definition, little one. What arbitrariness are you trying to impose here?
|
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:09PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View OverclockedJesus...'s Profile
|
#
|
||||||
Tesfan Posted:
It’s valid for both sides, male reproductive organweed. |
|||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:09PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View shrtcat's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
OverclockedJesus Posted:
What about folds in space/time that would allow continuity and yet altered laws of physics? If the universe folds upon itself, several constants of the universe would cease to be constant at long distances. This hypothesis (I first saw in a sci magazine) would solve many of the odd problems that seem to defy explanation. |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:09PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View DarkDespair5's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Hobart Bliggity Posted: Yes, that’s precisely what you’re doing.
|
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:10PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View OverclockedJesus...'s Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
If your only vantage point of my square circle was from dead-on the z-axis, could you prove that I hadn’t drawn one? |
||||||
| Posted On: 12/07/2008 10:10PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Indiana Jonas's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
