Buy Brownie Points
Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion
Macho Looser rules in Game Discussion may be appropriate

FAIL

Avatar: 36735 2015-06-13 23:04:37 -0400
6

[Full of SbumSS]

Level 25 Re-Re

Head of the Ministry of Man bumes

This thread is intended to be a serious discussion of GD rules, so I put it here.

I completely understand that there should be a place where people can have serious discussions about the game without being trolled, but I think the rules are a little too strict.

I don’t want this thread to become an “UNBAN ______” thread, or a “Banhammer sucks as a mod” thread, because he is doing what he should by enforcing the rules how they are now. I just think that maybe the rules should be changed a little to not ban someone for making a funny post that might be a slight jab against someone else as long as it is at least relevant to the topic or doesn’t completely derail the thread.

Also, allcaps/boldcaps is a pretty silly reason to ban someone I think. IMO it would be like banning someone for using emoticons in GD.

How it is now, Game Discussion should be renamed to BANZONE: IF YOU ARE A FUNNY OR GOOD POSTER POST HERE TO BE BANNED.

Many of the things people are banned for are petty things that don’t affect the thread as a whole at all. I think that if you are going to ban people for obvious jokes at the expense of someone who takes the internet too seriously in a game about trolling, it gets a little gay.

I think Banhammer said it well with a post about how everyone had to type “I am not easily offended” before coming on the site. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think trolling should be encouraged in Game Discussion, and I think that threads with specific game-related questions should be left alone but come on, sometimes a little blank line spam or not so subtle jabs against people are funny.

































































































LOVE,

FAIL

BirdofPrey

Avatar: 2037 Sun May 10 02:46:48 -0400 2009
10

[Team Shortbus]

Level 10 Troll

I lick her up afterwards (After her great times session too! Yum!)

swingin’ my banhammer at this thread

elenaratelim-
it

Avatar: 24791 2010-03-21 18:12:06 -0400
17

[Team Shortbus]

Level 44 Troll

chica bonita

I agree and was actually thinking this earlier. Unless someone is derailing GD I don’t see the point in banning someone because of one post that has no overall effect on the thread or forum.

It’s also kind of a bummer how people get accused of trolling in GD whenever their post isn’t really polite/nice. People can be posting seriously and still not be nice…

I realize an all or nothing rule is easier to enforce, but it isn’t always fair for someone to lose visits/play time because of technical rule breaking/silly post in GD.

Mod ethics are srsly srs! No but really… Log in to see images!

FAIL

Avatar: 36735 2015-06-13 23:04:37 -0400
6

[Full of SbumSS]

Level 25 Re-Re

Head of the Ministry of Man bumes

bump because not enough people have agreed with me

SG94

Avatar: 53266 2011-07-31 00:43:01 -0400
20

[SG Inc]

Level 35 Troll

The most anal, compulsive tattle tale on this site, mess with me and meet the ban axe ****

Signed, obviously.

MC Banhammer

Avatar: 1887 2011-07-31 00:40:59 -0400
36

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Troll

Trying to create drama to drum up the ratings by any means necessary!

To be explaining— sorry, thinking about HappyFunKitty.

FAIL, please explain how your POV is consistent with this CZ Twitter entry?

Summergirl_94

Avatar: Blonde Girl
17

[Good Omens]

Level 35 Camwhore

“Legs Wide Open”

MC Banhammer Posted:

To be explaining— sorry, thinking about HappyFunKitty.

FAIL, please explain how your POV is consistent with this CZ Twitter entry?

FAIL’s POV is like superconsistent with this one thoughLog in to see images!

And to get all serious hows a little joke from time to time “being an bumhole”?

Endedrural

Avatar: 36629 Fri Oct 24 22:53:46 -0400 2008
16

Level 35 Troll

“Problem Child IV”

I agree with this thread, but I think people should also take some responsibility for their posts. Even if the rules in Game Discussion are overly strict, you should still take that into consideration before posting something that might potentially get you banned. I can sympathize with people for getting banned over stupid/funny/trollish posts, but it’s still their fault for posting it in the first place.

MC Banhammer

Avatar: 1887 2011-07-31 00:40:59 -0400
36

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Troll

Trying to create drama to drum up the ratings by any means necessary!

Summergirl_94 Posted:

And to get all serious hows a little joke from time to time “being an bumhole”?

It’s not, and many little jokes are left completely untouched.

The post which FAIL specifically links to is in a thread about the history of Forumwarz which contains tidbits about how Forumwarz the site has changed over time. The post itself does nothing to contribute to the site’s significant history and all it does is insult a user.

Agent_Orange

Avatar: Toy Mouth

[Team Shortbus]

Level 10 Troll

I do not move out of the way

BirdofPrey Posted:

swingin’ my banhammer at this thread

rping in a non-roleplaying forum requesting ban

****tlebricks

Avatar: 64836 Sun Oct 26 21:31:24 -0400 2008
4

[Team Shortbus]

Level 35 Troll

“Problem Child IV”

FAIL Posted:

Also, allcaps/boldcaps is a pretty silly reason to ban someone I think.

Nillo

Avatar: 13243 2015-07-21 17:58:06 -0400
13

[COMPOSOLITION]

Level 35 Emo Kid

I suck dirty homeless guys male reproductive organs all night long

It was a poor example of a “funny post in GD”, and I disagree with your main point. We already have half a dozen forums where you can blank line spam and do whatever the hell you want, and Game Discussion is not one of them. If you don’t like serious discussion, don’t post in GD.

FAIL

Avatar: 36735 2015-06-13 23:04:37 -0400
6

[Full of SbumSS]

Level 25 Re-Re

Head of the Ministry of Man bumes

MC Banhammer Posted:

It’s not, and many little jokes are left completely untouched.

The post which FAIL specifically links to is in a thread about the history of Forumwarz which contains tidbits about how Forumwarz the site has changed over time. The post itself does nothing to contribute to the site’s significant history and all it does is insult a user.

I almost didn’t link to that post because I didn’t want it to be about Leechbait, that was just a recent example of a post that I thought was harmless.

But since you mentioned it, IMO things that happen in flamebate are just as notable fwz happenings as things that happen in dom, or klan changes, and things like that. I think when the creator of the game says you are being bumhurt and leave the site, it is a pretty notable thing to write about…

Anyway, I guess I don’t have a very valid argument I just think too many people take the internet seriously when they shouldn’t. I wouldn’t give a **** if someone posted something calling me bumhurt, or changed my avatar, or posted blankline spam, or trolled any of my threads so I don’t think other people should care either. But they do, so I guess **** me.

maxvance

Avatar: Red Green Flashing
9

Level 28 Troll

“Gaping Asshole”

I think Game Discussion is fine as it is.

Tesfan

Avatar: 17396 2011-07-31 06:49:56 -0400
3

[Team Shortbus]

Level 35 Troll

Sucks **** through a straw in the face of convention

Nillo Posted:

It was a poor example of a “funny post in GD”, and I disagree with your main point. We already have half a dozen forums where you can blank line spam and do whatever the hell you want, and Game Discussion is not one of them. If you don’t like serious discussion, don’t post in GD.

it’s not that we (i) want to blank line spam, post gay porn, and completely turn game disscussion into a trollhole where we flame the **** out of each other, i just hate having to change my personality ever time i enter game disscussion

let me give you an example. when i disagree with someone, i might tend to use something like sarcasm, or exaggerated hypotheticals, and the like to break down someone’s argument. now, if someone gets bumhurt because i get sbumy at them in game disscussion, then maybe they weren’t entirely truthful when they said “I am not easily offended”. Log in to see images!

1338h4x

Avatar: 22473 Sat Nov 29 21:01:08 -0500 2008
5

[Crotch Zombie]

Level 35 Troll

7 Vibrating Doldoes was never a meme

Tesfan Posted:

it’s not that we (i) want to blank line spam, post gay porn, and completely turn game disscussion into a trollhole where we flame the **** out of each other, i just hate having to change my personality ever time i enter game disscussion

let me give you an example. when i disagree with someone, i might tend to use something like sarcasm, or exaggerated hypotheticals, and the like to break down someone’s argument. now, if someone gets bumhurt because i get sbumy at them in game disscussion, then maybe they weren’t entirely truthful when they said “I am not easily offended”. Log in to see images!

This. Sure nobody should be outright trolling in GD but the rules are a tad strict as is.

TeeKayEff

Avatar: TeeKayEff's Avatar
13

[Team Shortbus]

Level 34 Troll

“Problem Child IV”

If not allowing mild/funny trolling, we should at least allow allcaps posts. Banning on the count of those is just ridiculous.

scully

Avatar: 12797 2015-07-20 16:59:13 -0400
77

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Camwhore

I really do talk ****!

Honestly, I think where the angst comes from is that known trolls tend to be viewed a bit more harshly while posting in GD. This isn’t mod fault or rule fault, it’s just that having earned a rep for being a naughtypants, everyone is more likely to point the troll finger than they are at some random person who might very well be underhandedly trolling.

It’s a fine line, and any level of sarcasm is often looked at as trolling. It is extremely hard to point out that someone is being an oblivious moron in GD without worrying about being looked as as trolling GD.

That said, I’d rather have it this way. GD needs the rules. There needs to be a place that is geared toward honest straight forward game discussion. If getting that on a site that encourages trolling means GD is a vast land of unfunny, literal posts so be it.

bummoppet

Avatar: 47899 2011-07-31 00:21:31 -0400
16

Level 60 Troll

“Grendel”

I don’t know who or what FAIL is referring to but I agree that just because someone isn’t saying something nice or is saying something contrary does not auctomatically mean they are trolling. Trolling is specific actions done with the intent to incite a negative response and derail the thread. You can be a total **** or bumhole while being on topic and not derailing the thread. If saying something that might be a bit mean but on topic is banworthy then maybe it should be renamed happy fun zone no meaniez allowed or something.

Possibly a C-
abbage

Avatar: 76887 Fri Oct 24 03:39:44 -0400 2008
9

[Leafy Green Vegeta-
bles
]

Level 35 Hacker

Herbaceous, biennial, dicotyledonous , and flowering.

However, considering that this forum is for serious straightforward discussion of the actual game, personal attacks of any kind don’t really belong here. I mean, it’s not like there’s not somewhere else to engage in those. If that results in this forum being boring, so be it. There’s plenty of non-boring forums here if that sort of thing is your cup of beverage.

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!