You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
Arktor's Flamebate Posts
View Arktor's Profile
| Search Results | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Last post wins 3 BPpost. where did that word come from, anyways? Post office? Postal service? Post box? Poster? (view post) |
05/31/2008 |
|
DOMINATION SEASON ENDING!Leechbait Posted:
Don’t give away my strategy. Bastard. (view post) |
05/28/2008 |
|
|
DOMINATION SEASON ENDING!so Velveteen is the dominatrix, and I’m submissive.
Hm… we need a cybersex forum Log in to see images! (view post) |
05/28/2008 |
|
What I learned from dominationI lied about having MySpace Tom nudes Log in to see images! (view post) |
05/28/2008 |
|
|
What I learned from dominationI have a secret gangbang fetish Log in to see images! (view post) |
05/28/2008 |
|
Saving Visits: Increase deliveries?Acid Flux Posted:
It can’t be extrapolated to Praypal, which nets an easy 150% as much cred as PP runs did. Data suggests that Praypal has roughly the same flezz/run ratio as pp, despite the greatly increased cred.
Why does such an easy forum give so much cred, anyways? (view post) |
05/22/2008 |
|
Who wants a mod in their klan?Tempting… although you’d bring us down on Flezz. And Cred.
But here’s our benefits: -We have a picture of a horse. (view post) |
05/22/2008 |
|
|
DOMINATION SEASON ENDING!FAIL Posted:
On a similar note I like the reset. I was hoping one would happen; this dom round’s just been full of exploits and bugs. It’ll be nice to start on the same page as everyone. (view post) |
05/08/2008 |
|
|
DOMINATION SEASON ENDING!MC Banhammer Posted:
http://www.forumwarz.com/domination/archive/2008-05-07
I think it would require a lot of luck. (view post) |
05/08/2008 |
|
|
DOMINATION SEASON ENDING!Nice.
Now if only it were possible for me to overtake Barely Legal. (view post) |
05/08/2008 |
|
Congratulations threadHell yeah KoLOL. With their leet vanilla raids they’re just unstoppable. They just dominated all of the top brackets. (view post) |
05/08/2008 |
|
Domination brackets shouldn't be sorted by name by defaultscullyangel Posted:
Maybe you should be able to target whoever is currently leading for total, or whoever has fav flava, or whoever has min? It would add a strategic element to the game. Although taking a ten-scoop hit is a lot more devastating for someone trying for min. (view post) |
05/08/2008 |
|
|
Thinks to text the s.o. when drunkum lol? boys tell me that stuff when their sober (view post) |
05/08/2008 |
|
|
Domination brackets shouldn't be sorted by name by defaultIt just doesn’t make sense. Why not have the default be total scoops, or something… logical? (view post) |
05/07/2008 |
|
A very SERIOUS discussion about Antifreeze Scoops. Seriously.markchd Posted:
Let’s suppose that the net return on a hand of blackjack is roughly 0.50.
Now, let’s bumume that the player has made 100,000 flezz over the course of 500 wins (i.e. 250 scoops), starting at 150,000 flezz. All bets are made for 1,000 flezz. Then the player has lost about 400 games. [These numbers are based on what I’ve noticed between the Flezz leaderboard, the number of antifreeze scoops earned, and cred earned [which can be used to approximate flezz earned the next day.])
Then what are the odds of winning at least 500 out of 900 games? Well, we can use a normal distribution with a mean of 450, and a standard deviation of sqrt(900*0.5*0.5) = 15. Thus values in excess of 100,000 net profit are 3.333 standard deviations above the mean. This corresponds to roughly an 0.000429 chance, or 0.0429%. See this link if you want to check for yourself. You can also play around with the numbers. My calculations suggest the odds could be as high as 0.51 in the player’s favor, in which case the odds are a noticeably higher 0.3135% – still very, very improbable.
Of course, this still does not take into account situations where the player goes bankrupt before being able to play 900 games, i.e. if the player gets a bad losing streak fairly early on. And once you arrive at a final number, square that in order to accommodate for this happening not once, but twice (the second at a noticeably higher initial value.)
Then again, my initial bumumptions may be wrong. I can’t claim to have meticulously recorded them, and so I’d welcome any corrections. (view post) |
05/01/2008 |
|
An official public apology to KoLoLI lol’d (view post) |
04/30/2008 |
|
|
A very SERIOUS discussion about Antifreeze Scoops. Seriously.Oh by the way, antifreeze scoops seem to be capped. (view post) |
04/30/2008 |
|
|
A very SERIOUS discussion about Antifreeze Scoops. Seriously.Sux2BU Posted:
I don’t see this post contributing to the discussion either. But honestly, if Sancdar’s going to pull stuff out of his bum, I can’t argue with it, because the argument’s already been made. If I went around in every thread saying “No you’re wrong” with no content, would that be allowed? (view post) |
04/30/2008 |
|
|
A very SERIOUS discussion about Antifreeze Scoops. Seriously.Sancdar Posted:
You can’t honestly be as dumb as you pretend to be. (view post) |
04/30/2008 |
|
|
A very SERIOUS discussion about Antifreeze Scoops. Seriously.Look at the Flezz leaderboard. Summergirl is exploiting it. Statistically, there’s a 1:10^35 chance of consistently making that much money from blackjack. (view post) |
04/30/2008 |