CarlieGotfingered Posted:

Right, because you’re the grand arbiter of enjoyment in books? There’s more than one reason to read a book, and more than one way to enjoy that book. You clearly require complex and deep plot points to enjoy a book. That’s fine, just try to keep from saying that people are very special for thinking any other part of a book can be enjoyable.

Your viewpoint is not the only one. Learn some tolerance, Mr. Furry.

Oh, and books, they are paper. Do you not understand how the text gets to the book, or the mechanics of printing?

Hopefully you understand that a Novel is not a Pop-Up book, and the two are never compared, for obvious reasons. Someone who enjoys Shakespere is unlikely to enjoy Pat the Bunny in the same respect, however, while someone who enjoys Pat the Bunny isn’t wrong for doing so, they most certainly are wrong for trying to say that Pat the Bunny is better than Shakespere because it’s “funnerer” and “gots that soft fuzzy bit”. The two are simply not the same thing.

That’s your strawman.