1337xxxxxxxxxlolololololololololxxxxxxxxx1337 Posted:

1. The 4/20 one where UC and I got banned for our queued ban lengths while Fingerz got off with a few hours. This ban was due to ET’s whims vs. Banhammer doing things fairly. And yes, I think Banhammer takes CD too seriously, but I know he tries hard to be fair about things. Since I’m being sincere I will say I actually have respect for his efforts and what he puts up with. Buuut that makes it more fun to mess with him.

2. FAIL’s milkbum ban. No one agreed it was shock, and that was the problem. I do have a problem with some of the oldest and best rp-ers getting banned for on-the-line things like that one and SG’s recent one.

1.- Agreed, it was a bull**** ban.

2.- It wasn’t FAIL, it was Peregrine, posting gay porn. FAIL posted lesbian porn (gay) and asked for a ban to support Peregrine. Then the shock in RP rule changed, so yay.

And @Banhammer, if mods actually took the people asking for “definition” of rules like a joke, because it always is, we wouldn’t be having this discussion. On most places I’ve seen “The rule doesn’t specify X!!!!11!!1!” mods answer “It’s at mod’s discression”“Stop trying to bend the rules” and people shut up. Maybe that was what should have been done in the begining.