plk Posted:

I’m reading your posts and I think I get to respond to whatever part of them currently offends me the most. I thought the “fetish” notion had been adequately addressed, but in case it hasn’t? Homosexuality is not a fetish. I feel very sorry for you that you believe that it is.

How is it that attraction to another gender isn’t a fetish but attraction to children or animals or even people in fursuits for that matter is?

Does that mean that everything listed above is a sexual orientation and deserves equal rights as well? I’m sorry but I’m not giving a bestialist the right to marry an animal, nor a pedo the right to marry a child. All of the above are perversions of the normal, natural working order of nature, and as such, are all fetishes.

If it doesn’t make babies, it’s a fetish. Liking feet doesn’t make babies; it’s a fetish. Liking fursuits doesn’t make babies; it’s a fetish. Non-reproductory sexual objects/behaviors = fetishes, and homosexuality is lumped in there. Sorry to be blunt, but this is getting ridiculous.

EDIT: Extend it to other “genders.” Liking hermaphrodites is considered a fetish porn, and they’re not lobbying for equal rights, or balking at the term “fetish.”