Samildanach Posted:

Instinctively, to me, setting a static number target with a theoretically growing playerbase is problematic. If a player stays active after hitting that point, there’s just no way a new player can break in.

If it were instead a percentile based on active players that pruned inactive former players from the boards (based on whatever definitions of active/inactive seem appropriate to The Powers That Be), I would be more likely to sign onto that. My usual disclaimer applies.

This would be true if there weren’t a large percentage of people who decide to stop. There are also several boards (buildr and flezz) where the holder’s position can go down.