Check out our blog!
Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion

Viewing a Post

Indiana Jonas

Avatar: 13850 2014-12-19 09:36:26 -0500
13

[At Least I Never M-
ade A Failure Of A-
Website
]

Level 35 Troll

WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW

FAIL Posted:

I agree. For example, if I were to make a post in Game Discussion where I called Hobart Bliggity a gigantic fabulous person, he would also know that I’m just a close friend poking light fun at him.

wtf dude reported.

Seriously though, there will never be a definitive answer on shock images. What is “shock” and what isn’t is completely subjective. I think the only way to find a middle ground on this is to not ban for borderline shock, but just remove/edit the post. When someone posts goatse, the mod has to go in and edit the post anyway, so why not just leave it at that for questionable cases.

Obviously, a precedent has been set for goatse, so that won’t fly without official word. But for other images, just remove/edit the post, and take action as necessary if a player chooses to keep posting an image that was previously deemed inappropriate. That way, if I find an image that I think is borderline, I can post it, and if it gets reported and edited out, I know not to post that one anymore. If it sticks, I know that image is fine and won’t have to question using it. I just don’t agree with bans for borderline images, and this way the mods still control the content without any kind of guesswork.

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!