tl;dr

CANTERZI Posted:

Get ready, Unfair distribution of Brownie Points; here comes the truth train! When writing this letter, I had originally intended to segregate the pure errors of fact in Unfair distribution of Brownie Points’s comments from the bumertions of questionable judgment where there could be room for dispute. I eventually decided against that approach because Unfair distribution of Brownie Points sees the world as somewhat anarchic, a game of catch-as-catch-can in which the sneakiest idiots nab the biggest prizes. This is not the first time I’ve wanted to spread awareness of the rancorous nature of Unfair distribution of Brownie Points’s quips. But it is the first time I realized that once one begins thinking about free speech, about slatternly despots who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own impulsive beliefs, one realizes that there’s a lot of daylight between its views and mine. Unfair distribution of Brownie Points believes that it can brandish the word “contemporaneousness” (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible and get away with it while I claim that its principles have unquestionably been demonstrated to be coterminous with those of rapacious perjurers. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that as long as I live and breathe, I will strive to oppose our human vices wherever they may be found — arrogance, hatred, jealousy, unfaithfulness, avarice, and so on? I’ll tell you what I think the answer is. I can’t prove it, but if I’m correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that its most predaceous tactic is to fabricate a phony war between unrestrained clowns and nugatory derelicts. This way, Unfair distribution of Brownie Points can subjugate both groups into helping it empty the meaning of such concepts as “self,” “justice,” “freedom,” and other profundities. I surely don’t want that to happen, which is why I’m telling you that if I didn’t sincerely believe that I’ve received appreciative notes from academic psychologists and students of culture who deplore the misapplication of their subjects by ideologues like Unfair distribution of Brownie Points, then I wouldn’t be writing this letter.

The objection may still be raised that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. At first glance this sounds almost believable yet the following must be borne in mind: If the past is any indication of the future, Unfair distribution of Brownie Points will once again attempt to introduce disease, ignorance, squalor, idleness, and want into affluent neighborhoods. Maybe Unfair distribution of Brownie Points is being manipulated by hotheaded, pesky grifters, but even so, its words are a logical absurdity, a series of deductions from a premise that has been denied. Speaking of absurdities, the point at which you discover that Unfair distribution of Brownie Points has been cynically and deliberately violating its oath not to break down our communities is not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a determination that this, of itself, is prima facie evidence that right is right and wrong is wrong. That’s the sort of statement that some people contend is oleaginous but which I believe is merely a statement of fact. And it’s a statement that needs to be made because that fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. “Thinking” is the key word in the previous sentence.

Because we have the determination to see the truth prevail, we must never forget that only the impartial and unimpbumioned mind will even consider that we must soon make one of the most momentous decisions in history. We must decide whether to let Unfair distribution of Brownie Points annihilate a person’s personality, individuality, will, and character or, alternatively, whether we should embark on a new path towards change. Upon this decision rests the stability of society and the future peace of the world. My view on this decision is that Unfair distribution of Brownie Points’s fantasy is to trample over the very freedoms and rights that it claims to support. It dreams of a world that grants it such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of mandarinism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that one could truthfully say that another piece of supporting evidence is that Unfair distribution of Brownie Points maintains a cozy relationship with combative putrid-types. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that its forces’ thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be. I would like to close by saying that anyone the least bit knowledgeable about Unfair distribution of Brownie Points’s mawkish background would know that Unfair distribution of Brownie Points is obviously hiding something.