OverclockedJesus Posted:

You have to show that you did. That mean you have to show that it is both an equilateral quadrilateral with all interior angles as right angles (i.e. you have to show the angles) AND show that it is the locus of all points equidistant from a central point (i.e. show the circle). You can’t show draw a line and call it a square circle. That’s cowardly.

Dodge away, O Trolly McTrollersons.

I know your silly little definitions. You can stop repeating them, but thank you for making sure I’m following. What you’re failing to understand is if we’re taking the problem of a square circle’s existence as a metaphor for God’s existence, you have just as hard a time proving I didn’t draw one as I do proving that I did. From the vantage point I’ve created, neither one of us can prove the other wrong.

I drew a square circle, and theres no way you can totally refute that.