Schiznit Posted:

Inertia:

Your first three “proofs” are all the cosmological argument in fancy dress. We can all agree there must have been “the first movement”, but to attribute the qualities of omnipotence, omniscience etc that we attribute to god has no explanation.

Argument from degree: You are creating a thing which does not necessarly exist. Some cats are bigger than others, does this mean there must be a cat bigger than we can possibly imagine?

Teological argument: Nice word play, but I remain unconvinced. Acting towards an end is indeed a characteristic of intelligence, but it is not in itself a proof of inteligence.

Oh I just copypastad it from Thomas Aquinas page in wikipedia. I agree with what you said about the 5th argument