xXxTJF588xXx Posted:

In a later chat with Drrty, you can respon with

But…there’s no way you could’ve have known that…

.. and from her…

DrrtyCop74 Posted:

Making me like some kind of RENEGADE?! Some kind of LOOSE CANNON?!?!

... with the player response using “look”. I semi-think these, at least the first one, have been posted before, though…

AND from the next court hearing (this might’ve been pointed out with the Digi-Vasect thing I remember reading here)...

I would like introduce to the court…my most recent sTalk log with Ms. Cop74!

... missing a “to”.

Also, with one of the Junk items… <checks alts after getting through with the above> Wait, it’s gone! Hm, whatever. The point I’d’ve made with it is that, along with the internet/Internet incosistencies (even among non-”personal” sources), there’s the matter of sentences that partly warrant a question mark due to and additional phrase, such as “blahblahblah declaratory statement, won’t you.” sorts of things. MOst of it isn’t inquisitive, but the extra bit changes it like a vaginoplasty changes a man… kinda.

NOTE: might removes redundancies if I feel embarrbumed by their presence

*sigh* Didn’t switch back to my main before posting; tricksy header images. Anyway, a minor, trivial matter, but when it’s revealed that Nordstrom is not the nationality he’s claimed, the exclamation mark is italicized along with his proper possesive pronoun…. thing. Is that intended to be that way? I’d bumume it is, but, again, bringing forth any and everything.
TJF588 edited this message on 10/21/2008 4:37PM