enire Posted:

I like the idea of more pranks, but I don’t think they should interfere with people’s game play or BPs.

I think SIG’s idea of paying extra to “lock” the effects of a prank is a great one, but it might not be good for the BP economy (CZ must have done well from the little avatar war that was fought over SIG yesterday; with locked sigs, that couldn’t have happened).

Another thought: Perhaps you could pay to mess with people’s profiles.

the lock could work in reverse too, so you have a shield against the next av/title/etc prank