Miss Trent Posted:

I guess what I’m leaving out is which is making my opinion hard to understand is that if it was truly popular opinion, it might be ok. But I believe it would more likely come down to the opinion of the most vocal, which is often not the same as the opinion of everyone. (Which is the reason for my example).

I’m bumuming most players would come out of the woodwork once a player of theirs was banned to show support. Much like what happened when Myspace Tom left.

There’s also the possibility of a more democratic way of voting. Maybe a poll or something. The community is still small enough to allow that sort of thing.

But then again I was never for banning based on popular opinion to begin with, which I posted earlier.

As far as Kraid’s banning being unfair being your opinion, of course it’s your opinion and you don’t need to designate it as such. But your statement that Kraid shouldn’t be banned because it was unfair seems to bumume that a result will occur based on your opinion, which means your opinion must be the bumumed truth. You have stated it like it is a widely-known fact. Maybe this is me misreading your intent.

Why would I voice my opinion if it wasn’t my wish for a result to occur? Why would I voice it if I believed it should have no effect?

You’ve voiced your opinion the same way I’ve voiced mine. Did not say you don’t believe bans should be made based on popular opinion hoping it would be taken into account?