BUT ANYWAYS, YOUR MOST RECENT HORRIBLY WRONG POST DISTRACTED ME FROM POINTING OUT THE OTHER HORRIBLY WRONG THINGS IN THIS POST

L2 Posted:

It’s not science’s place to say “We can’t study this, so we’ll ignore it.” Good science constantly searches for a way to study or measure something, then proves or disproves it from the results.

It’s the scientific method’s job to do exactly that.

I mean, honestly, you could not have gotten science more wrong.

You said the exact opposite of what is actually true. I’m not exaggerating here either, that is *literally* the exact opposite of what’s true.

Give me an example of some of this “Good science.”

Good science studies ideas which it is able to study, and does not waste resources trying to figure out ways to study things without any supporting evidence.