1338h4x Posted:

Don’t teach religion in my science clbum and I won’t go into your church and point out every single contradiction in the bible, all statements in there that have been disproven, etc etc.

And no, ID cannot be studied. There’s no way of disproving it since no matter what we do or what scientific advancements are made in the field of observing stuff, Christfabulous persons will simply put their fingers in their ears and bumert that God is invisible/intangible/undetectable and nothing we do disproves that. If it cannot be proven/disproven, it’s not science.

I agree that ID and Creationism should be kept out of the science clbumroom; that’s one of the reasons we should teach introductory level culture/religions clbumes in high-school, or even middle-school, levels.

However, it’s narrow-sighted to say that it’s impossible to study ID. At the moment, it certainly is, but in the same scope, we haven’t DISPROVED ID either.

It’s not science’s place to say “We can’t study this, so we’ll ignore it.” Good science constantly searches for a way to study or measure something, then proves or disproves it from the results.