Check out our blog!
Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion

Viewing a Post

markchd

Avatar: 12369 2010-01-24 16:26:11 -0500
18

[Brainfreeze]

Level 69 Camwhore

Craves Power like it's Crystal Pepsi

BINGEBOT 2015 Posted:

...

Step 2 – Blackjack balancing:

– Blackjack (21) payout is 6:5 (instead of 3:2)

– Push (ties) yeilds (sic) 75% return only

– Dealer hits on a soft 17

– Multiple decks (4)

– Option to split

– Maybe: After splitting, player receive 1 scoop for winning each hand or loses 1 for losing each hand

– Can’t double down a split

– No spliting aces

– Maybe: On double down, player receive 2 scoops for winning, lose 1 for losing

Multi deck and 6:5. Why not just straight Vegas rules multi deck blackjack? Continuous shuffle kills the card counters, so nobody would do better than basic strategy. The 75% push is just weird. If you want to use rule variations, look at online odds calculators, like this one: http://www.drgamble.com/rules/blackjackcalculator.htm to get to the odds you want. No split aces is a good idea, IMHO. Why reinvent blackjack? If you can’t get to the odds you want with reasonable rules, maybe you don’t want blackjack in the game.

Also, most folks only double down when it’s already a smart bet. Why should they get double scoops?

markchd edited this message on 05/02/2008 4:16PM
Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!