Sir Tasnica Posted:

The first part of Step 1 is redundant. No one in their right mind would play the other games for their five antifreeze (if it is true that there is indeed a strategy for profiting from Blackjack).

In fact, adding antifreeze to all games (most specifically RPS) will lead to further consequences. Once Step 2 is implemented everyone will switch to RPS for their antifreeze (RPS breaks even on average), and once Step 3 is implemented everyone with a decent bankroll will once again be earning infinite antifreeze.

Antifreeze, in my opinion, should never be added to a game with 50/50 or better odds.

Yeah I think you’re right. Before we look on lifting the AF limit we’ll have to visit whether RPS should yield scoops at all (which it probably shouldn’t).