You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
- « previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next »
![]() |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Heh, sorry… fixed.
|
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 9:02AM | View Acid Flux's Profile | # | ||||||
|
LOL, you win the internet!
sorry, no, you can’t give it back Log in to see images! MySpace Tom edited this message on 05/18/2008 9:57PM |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 9:05AM | View MySpace Tom's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Piglet Posted: No need, Evil Trout just kicked over our sand castle. |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 9:14AM | View Acid Flux's Profile | # | ||||||
|
|||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 9:21AM | View MySpace Tom's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Acid Flux Posted:
What exploit? I thought that was an intentional game mechanic, not a bug. |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 12:04PM | View Sancdar's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Sancdar Posted:
I consider an exploit to either be a bug or an intentional ‘hidden’ mechanic. And only the programmer can say which is which after the fact. |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 12:13PM | View Acid Flux's Profile | # | ||||||
|
http://www.forumwarz.com/spoilers/revision/Vanilla_Scoops/1 The first version of the Vanilla Scoop page on the wiki, written by Evil Trout, mentions the tactic. This was up long before even the first major raid. I remember being surprised that nobody knew about it, since I’d seen it in the wiki before ever playing Domination.
So yeah, not exactly a hidden mechanic. Sancdar edited this message on 04/03/2008 12:32PM |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 12:32PM | View Sancdar's Profile | # | ||||||
|
It’s a matter of semantics, not really worth a debate, ya know? |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 12:45PM | View Acid Flux's Profile | # | ||||||
|
A matter of semantics? My point is that you threw out a stupid example to defend yourself, not that your terminology sucks. If you want to keep calling intentional/disclosed game mechanics exploits, go for it. |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 12:56PM | View Sancdar's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Sancdar Posted: You don’t remember the ‘puzzle thread’?
Sancdar Posted: The difference between an approved exploit and an unapproved exploit is one is called a game mechanic and one is called a bug. It’s semantics. Acid Flux edited this message on 04/03/2008 2:17PM |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 2:12PM | View Acid Flux's Profile | # | ||||||
|
I agree that the “puzzle thread” was a bit over the top, but keep in mind that most Klans already had a pretty good idea of how it was done.
More relevantly, our “exploit” was directly shared with Evil Trout practically as soon as we discovered it (if not immediately, then at the latest it was after our first raid which earned an astonishing 24 scoops). He gave it his complete approval, and it was only later when a lot of organization and work pushed the potential of raids higher and higher that a nerf became necessary. We were not the only ones who knew about it, nor indeed were we the only Klan actively raiding.
Then there’s your “exploit”, which Evil Trout removed as soon as it came to his attention. That’s what I consider to be the difference between an approved “exploit” (though I’d hardly call it an exploit since Evil Trout admitted that he intended for Klans to earn Vanilla in that matter) and an unapproved exploit. |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 2:31PM | View Sir Tasnica's Profile | # | ||||||
|
The puzzle thread had nothing to do with raiding in any real manner (weren’t the answers all Tubmail?), and didn’t change the fact that the 12-11-12 technique was listed by a developer in the closest thing to a manual that the game has. |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 2:34PM | View Sancdar's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Sir Tasnica Posted:
A) This bug had been reported previously, multiple times. B) The Klan reported it as soon as it became common knowledge within the Klan. |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 2:37PM | View Acid Flux's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Sancdar Posted:
Actually, it was requested that when I mentioned the 12-11-12 publicly that I delete that text, to keep the ‘puzzle’ hidden. I did that to keep the mystery/fun alive. I can always repost the Tubmail I received from a SotQR member that specifically said they were trying to keep it quiet. Do I need to do so to prove my point? Acid Flux edited this message on 04/03/2008 2:43PM |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 2:40PM | View Acid Flux's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Sancdar Posted: |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 2:51PM | View Sancdar's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Acid Flux Posted:
I wasn’t aware of such an incident, and I don’t agree with the actions of that particular member. I was always under the impression that it was relatively common knowledge of how to do it, and as Sancdar stated the method could easily be concluded from reading the wiki (that’s where I, at least, got the idea).
That’s not my point, however. My point is that Evil Trout specifically approved of what we were doing before we received any significant advantage in domination because of it. He even said something to the effect of “other Klans will have to step up to the challenge”. That was clearly not the case in the exploit taken advantage of last week and widely demonstrated yesterday. |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 2:52PM | View Sir Tasnica's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Sancdar Posted:
SotQR Member Posted: According to this email, the Sisterhood won a few Domination Rounds before reporting the bug in question. Can anyone from the SotQR, past or present, comment on this to clarify? |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 4:10PM | View Acid Flux's Profile | # | ||||||
|
The “3-7 dominations” in question were 3-7 scoop rewards from holding 12 forums, not 3-7 rounds of domination. Hell, have we even had 7 dom rounds since raiding started?
The bug in question was difficult to confirm and was reported during the raid we found it. I’m still not even sure if it existed in the first place, but it’s definitely been fixed now if it did. |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 6:01PM | View Sancdar's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Acid Flux Posted:
The bug was something else completely different, that I discovered during our 360-scoop raid =P Sancdar ran to submit it breathlessly before the raid was even over, resulting in like 20 wasted visits on our next raid trying to figure out if it was still there or not. |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 6:11PM | View Lust's Profile | # | ||||||
|
None of that refutes the opinion that the SotQR used the bug before reporting it. Is this accurate or not? |
||||||
Posted On: 04/03/2008 6:13PM | View Acid Flux's Profile | # | ||||||
- « previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next »