You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
- « previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next »
![]() |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
momentumenergy Posted:
That’s the beauty of user-side scripting – if you don’t like it, change it. Personally, I liked it better with a strikethrough (I turn off graphics some times, when speedrunning), so I changed the code for that. |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 1:55AM | View Samildanach's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Samildanach Posted:
This sounds very good, can you share the code? |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 5:20AM | View Inertia's Profile | # | ||||||
|
was Posted:
So, your argument is based upon the choice of a single word in a particular context? It definitely sounds like you’re nitpicking.
And if a significant number of serious Dom Players use the script to bumist them, then choosing not to use it is a disadvantage. That could easily make it a ‘vital’ part of any competitive Dom strategy.
It’s your personal choice on whether or not to use this ‘piece of tech’ to bumist you. Baroness was simply giving a friendly heads-up to all the other players that use the script. |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 8:10AM | View Sergeant Cid's Profile | # | ||||||
|
|||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 8:26AM | View MC Banhammer's Profile | # | ||||||
|
I think the criticism of “vital” comes from the fact that one can simply pwn in order and not need to look at anything. One can check the done list. One can take a minute before starting visits and make note of which 12 forums they are doing next on *gasp* a piece of paper. The end results are the same.
When it is implied that something is delivering an overwhelming advantage (this is not) the importance could be mistaken. There is no pressing reason this should be bumped up the “to do” list and given higher priority. That would be foolish as there are far more pressing things for ET to do.
The implication that those without the script or using a different browser are at a major disadvantage is where the “this is not vital” or however it was worded comes from. It most certainly is not vital. I think I’ve done just fine without it. |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 8:47AM | View scully's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Inertia Posted:
It’s easy enough – just replace the lines var tmp = marker.cloneNode(true); forums[forum].appendChild(tmp);
with the line
forums[forum].setAttribute("style","text-decoration: line-through;");
Also, for even more visibility, you can use “background-color: red;” instead/also to put all the forums you’ve already run in a nice red box. Played around with both option for a while. |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 8:53AM | View Samildanach's Profile | # | ||||||
|
scully Posted:
I used to do this, and yes it works p much the same only takes longer. |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 9:53AM | View ChilePepino's Profile | # | ||||||
|
scully Posted:
No doubt. It’s just a handy way to keep track and avoid the 2 forums that appear twice. Imagine how much less we’d explain that to new players if it just showed them as already streaked in the forum/community forum and vanilla helper screens. markchd edited this message on 05/20/2009 10:14AM |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 10:11AM | View markchd's Profile | # | ||||||
|
ChilePepino Posted:
This. It’s not a necessity by a long shot, but it is a convenience. It just takes a necessary, boring, and ultimately mindless task, and automates it, to save the user time and energy. No one “needs” it, but a lot of people (myself included) appreciate it. |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 10:22AM | View Samildanach's Profile | # | ||||||
|
was Posted:
Your definition of handholding is apparently far different from mine.
Really, instead of using the vanilla helper, you could click the “expand details” links on the 4 forums/community forums you’re currently holding, but…why would you, when there’s an easily available tool that makes it far easier to gather the information you’re after?
The only difference here is one’s in-game, and the other’s a GM script. |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 10:25AM | View Ricket's Profile | # | ||||||
|
It also helps with picking jobs to accept. It adds a ton of convenience. |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 10:40AM | View markchd's Profile | # | ||||||
|
I just played around with this script a little. If you want the icon before the forum name, change forums[forum].appendChild(tmp); to forums[forum].parentNode.insertBefore(tmp, forums[forum]);
Personally, I like it the other way. |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 10:47AM | View Ricket's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Ricket Posted:
Any clue why the new forum doesn’t work with the script as written? |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 10:54AM | View markchd's Profile | # | ||||||
|
markchd Posted:
Probably the dash. Or some other special character. MC Banhammer edited this message on 05/20/2009 10:59AM |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 10:59AM | View MC Banhammer's Profile | # | ||||||
|
oh. the new forum is on the community forums page as Text-Based Warriors' Guild(spaces after)and on the streak page without. They are identical in the source code, though. Weirdness. Can I just beg ET to drop the trailing spaces from the forum name? markchd edited this message on 05/20/2009 11:00AM |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 11:00AM | View markchd's Profile | # | ||||||
|
markchd Posted:
That’s what I was looking for. I’m not sure why it’s breaking, but I know there was a similar issue when this script was first released with Dr. Jojo’s. It might’ve been due to the apostrophe, I’m not sure.
I’ll poke Neona when I see her online.
Edit: Or what you found. Log in to see images! Ricket edited this message on 05/20/2009 11:02AM |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 11:01AM | View Ricket's Profile | # | ||||||
|
markchd Posted:
Probably. In the meantime: MC Banhammer edited this message on 05/20/2009 11:03AM |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 11:02AM | View MC Banhammer's Profile | # | ||||||
Sergeant Cid Posted:
Please tell me, what is my argument? I am not sure how to respond without knowing what position I am supposed to be defending. |
|||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 6:01PM | View twas's Profile | # | ||||||
|
was Posted:
I believe you are arguing against defining the script as ‘vital’. I think the ‘necessity’ of the script is directly proportional to the level of Domination competition involved. If all of your competitors are using it and benefiting from the advantage it brings, then it can easily be considered ‘vital’.
In other words, it situational. I don’t compete heavily in Domination anymore, so it’s a ‘nice-to-have’ not a ‘have-to-have’. |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 6:46PM | View Sergeant Cid's Profile | # | ||||||
|
MC Banhammer Posted:
probably. I guess this might be my excuse to bum myself around to improving the matching code.. i had been planning on doing it eventually. I’ll update when i get it fixed, probably in a way that is more future-proof this time. |
||||||
Posted On: 05/20/2009 7:24PM | View Neona's Profile | # | ||||||
- « previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next »