Why don’t you try it out and see if it works?

was Posted:

Why don’t you try it out and see if it works?

You mean running both versions 1000 times and noting the statistics down?

Inertia Posted:

aside from 5 cards rule and split, how?

Gamblebot doesn’t play fair. It accomplishes highly improbable things with great regularity while you bust hitting on a 12 virtually all of the time.

Possibly a Cabbage Posted:

Gamblebot doesn’t play fair. It accomplishes highly improbable things with great regularity while you bust hitting on a 12 virtually all of the time.

I haven’t experienced this. While I occasionally get bit on a 12, it’s no more frequent that IRL. Most people that complain about this sort of thing are responding via emotion rather than actual data. If you get frustrated on a bad run, then you remember those 5 in a row bit 12s more vividly than you remember the 6 times that you got a 7-9 on your 12, because those happened sporadically over the course of your session.

Run some raw data, and then see if it’s still ‘virtually all the time’.

Acid Flux Posted:

I haven’t experienced this. While I occasionally get bit on a 12, it’s no more frequent that IRL. Most people that complain about this sort of thing are responding via emotion rather than actual data. If you get frustrated on a bad run, then you remember those 5 in a row bit 12s more vividly than you remember the 6 times that you got a 7-9 on your 12, because those happened sporadically over the course of your session.

Run some raw data, and then see if it’s still ‘virtually all the time’.

Totally agree with this, if anything I think gamblebot is a little easy on me. I have no problems raking in a few hundred thousand Log in to see images! a go if I’m really bored

Edit, then again I don’t use the wiki’s strategy just common sense so I can’t really comment on that