</troll>

Debate m = new Debate();

I’m mixing languages but who cares.

I seriously think this all started from a misunderstanding.

elenaratelimit Posted:

ITT:

So if atheism isn’t a belief how do you know it’s true?

/lame question/square circles

But no rly tell us?

/lame question

If you’re so smart where and what did YOU study?

/lame question

No but rly answer…?

/lame question

etc.

Debate would happen but all he does is go LALALALA I CAN’T HEAR YOU’RE A TROLL and this is where we end up.

Fallacy of the troll who thinks he can prove his point by making a inaccurate resumé of what actually happened

I want to have an actual debate, not a troll-fest.

I don’t see the point in insulting others for their beliefs or lack of beliefs.

Hobart Bliggity Posted:

I won the thrad

yea

BlankTH Posted:

You can’t prove that god doesn’t exist. You can only prove that there’s no proof of it.

Exactly. So both sides remain equal. (This is the type of posts i’m looking for, not this crap that elenaratelimit is posting.)

and by lock horns i mean **** all over

elenaratelimit Posted:

ITT:

So if atheism isn’t a belief how do you know it’s true?

/lame question/square circles

But no rly tell us?

/lame question

If you’re so smart where and what did YOU study?

/lame question

No but rly answer…?

/lame question

etc.

Debate would happen but all he does is go LALALALA I CAN’T HEAR YOU’RE A TROLL and this is where we end up.

He really was arguing before. He answered some Qs with questions relating an impossible scenario. It was a bit difficult to understand, but he wasn’t avoiding questions. All I know is it’s some sort of misunderstanding..

shrtcat Posted:

Then gtfo.

You’re trolling just as much as anyone so I guess shut up is what Im trying to say?

Hobart Bliggity Posted:

no, i pretty much did that other orthodox atheist is gone.

I think we were having a successful debate before..

Hobart Bliggity Posted:

When? When we were looking at that church of atheism site about imaginary God and the ridiculously flawed “proofs”?

Discussing the probability of a particular god. The multiple choice test argument is analogous to Pascal’s Wager. I pointed that out and then u came up with a rebumal.