You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
Vuron's Flamebate Posts
View Vuron's Profile
| Search Results | ||
|---|---|---|
|
More like The Great Firewall of HOLY **** THIS FORUM IS HARDGoth_Jesus Posted:
The problem is that even with a respec to get max defense the miss percentage is going to be heinously low on a re-re. I think it can be done but grinding feces enough times to get the required amount of smileprins seems stupid at best. (view post) |
06/02/2008 |
|
|
More like The Great Firewall of HOLY **** THIS FORUM IS HARDI did it at 225 on my emo because I’m too cheap to respec.
It was expensive as hell and my defense was low enough that it hardly ever missed.
I think either Pluvius or Ruiner of Fun will likely get the best time as they can power it with a defaced mona lisa. The defense bonus on that item should dramatically increase the miss percentage. (view post) |
06/02/2008 |
|
Thread of love, friendsip and being nice to one another for a change (vote for your favourite user)I’ll give Escher a vote maybe she’ll be back before too terribly long (view post) |
05/31/2008 |
|
Can we please change the endtime of domination rounds?I use bracket to describe the groupings as in “Those fabulous persons are in my bracket” or “Damn I have I weak bracket this week”.
Pods makes we think of orca whales. (view post) |
05/31/2008 |
|
|
Can we please change the endtime of domination rounds?That would be 6pm EDT which would basically screw most people who work 9-5 jobs in the majority of the US. I don’t know what percentage of the userbase is in that boat but I would say it’s a decent percentage.
If a static time is used it should be convenient for the vast majority of the userbase which is currently based in the US and Canada. The other option is a floating time that shifts around based on some sort of random number generator. That way you might have a great time one week and a horrible time another week. The only thing I think you would want to avoid is having domination too close to rollover. (view post) |
05/31/2008 |
|
|
Can we please change the endtime of domination rounds?I would start with an arbitrarily low number and maybe ratchet it up based on feedback from players. (view post) |
05/31/2008 |
|
|
Can we please change the endtime of domination rounds?Hythloday Posted:
So like a maximum of x cards in hand total? or a maximum of y card of each type?
I wouldn’t mind seeing a maximum “hand” of 7-10 cards. That way you would be encouraged to burn cards throughout the week while holding onto cards like shields and modests that can help during the final rush. (view post) |
05/31/2008 |
|
|
Can we please change the endtime of domination rounds?I think that what he’s trying to say is that currently it’s far to easy to hide behind a shell of shields that only become active in the last 15-20 minutes of play. In that case even a concerted effort by other serious players is unlikely to break the shell. (view post) |
05/31/2008 |
|
|
Can we please change the endtime of domination rounds?bumhole cards are a nice way for unklanned players to influence the course of domination. They might not be able to compete with klan vanilla raids but they can influence the course of events.
I think one idea for leveling the playing field would be to create a card that allows you to attack cards in another player’s hand. It would be random as to which one you destroy but it would allow people to attack other players hoarding shield and modests. (view post) |
05/31/2008 |
|
|
Can we please change the endtime of domination rounds?Pickled male reproductive organbum Posted:
Right now the no scoops until the last minute the enable shields and burn modests is basically the only way to effectively compete. Considering you could likely script the whole process of spending modests you could likely wait until the last minute or two every round and as long as you had more modests than anyone else you could get mins every week.
I understand people want domination to be utterly predictable but currently it makes domination rather boring. A predictable endgame really limits it’s appeal to a large percentage of the userbase. Considering the idea should be growing the community rather than shrinking it I think a variety of ideas that increase the randomness and thus the fun aspect of the game would be smart to incorporate. (view post) |
05/30/2008 |
|
|
Can we please change the endtime of domination rounds?While I think the timing is awkward for euro players they constitute a small fraction of the userbase.
I do however think some things can be done to limit the horde shields and modests until the last minute and blitz routine that everyone seems to do currently.
If you limit the number of cards that can be played in an hour it becomes a much more strategic game. Another idea would be to keep the time roughly the same but to have it end at a random time during that hour. You could hide the precise end time and people would need to rush a bit earlier or risk losing access to cards. (view post) |
05/30/2008 |
|
I want something to spend my Flezz onI have to say I support this notion. Even if it’s some sort of lame vanity feature you can unlock for some ridiculous amount of it would serve to remove a bunch of excess flezz from the game and make certain leaderboards easier for new players to have a hope of topping. (view post) |
05/30/2008 |
|
Ban reasons pollHonestly I’m not fond of an exhaustive list of reasons for banning because it just encourages people to ride the line of acceptable or even worse to mini-mod other posters. A less defined line insures that either people behave somewhat or they risk a ban. Needless to say several posters (primarily TSB) will continue to wildly flaunt the rules in order to achieve the lulz.
But remove the boldcaps banning rule, it’s lame to ban Pants for posting in character. (view post) |
05/30/2008 |
|
The voting ratio/Alt problem: opinions and suggestionsWell escher basically hasn’t played the games in weeks and her forumbuildr vote tally has suffered accordingly she used to vote a huge amount though. (view post) |
05/27/2008 |
|
|
The voting ratio/Alt problem: opinions and suggestionsI try to hide most of my alts and limit their posts to make them at least somewhat harder to detect. I have no idea if I’ve been remotely successful in my endevours though…
Anyway I wouldn’t mind that field disappearing from the profile completely. (view post) |
05/27/2008 |
|
|
ITT: FAIL SHOWS OFF HIS ILLUSTRIOUS ITEMActually the real item is significant superior to this item. (view post) |
05/27/2008 |
|
a suggestion on how to handle a de-cheat support optionSG94 Posted:
Well if you offer the decheat at like 1 BP it’s significantly cheaper than making a new legitimate alt. It allows people that maybe started out with a cheater to reuse that name on a character that can actually take part in endgames. (view post) |
05/27/2008 |
|
|
a suggestion on how to handle a de-cheat support optionI think scully is concerned that a decheated alt would retain some of the rollover turns. As such it would be easy to purchase a ton of visits and then decheat and then have a major advantage.
Personally I think you would need to make sure that access to skills (including dolphin) goes away and that all decheated characters get precisely 4 visits. (view post) |
05/27/2008 |
|
UNBAN FOETALBLOWJOB, SOMETHING WITTY AND MY MOTHERI agree far too long already (view post) |
05/27/2008 |
Domination pods as of May 26thWe used to have some really large pods before the seeding mechanism got changed. It seems pretty obvious to me that it would be good to have the pod seeding mechanism resolved prior to the second season of domination. (view post) |
05/27/2008 | |