Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

OverclockedJesus's Flamebate Posts

View OverclockedJesus's Profile

Only public flamebate results are returned.

« previous
1
... 9
10
11
12
13
... 16
next »

Search Results
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: I do and I drew one. If you don’t believe me prove me wrong. You have to show that you did. That mean you have to show that it is both an equilateral quadrilateral with all interior angles as right angles (i.e. you have to show the angles) AND show that it is the locus of all points equidistant from a central point (i.e. show the circle). You can’t show draw a line and call it a square circle. That’s cowardly. Dodge away, O Trolly McTrollersons. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: Yep keep hammering away. I will. Hobart Bliggity Posted: I am not trying to play the faith card You are. Hobart Bliggity Posted: other than to make you realize that your limited view of the universe Ad hominem fallacy in the general form of attacking all humanity, as well as fallacy of composition, i.e. Hobart doesn’t know something, therefore all of humanity doesn’t know it either. Hobart Bliggity Posted: only allows you so many vantage points to gauge what is possible and what isn’t. To believe that human logic There is only logic, little one. It’s not “human logic”. It’s “logic”. Silly mystic. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: dodge Yeah, I figured as much. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. DarkDespair5 Posted: It would cause distance-based variations in the laws of physics. It would still be part of the universe, bumuming for the sake of argument such is correct. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: I did. I drew one. No, you didn’t. Try again. Show how you can have an equilateral quadrilateral with all interior angles as right angles also be the locus of all points equidistant from a central point at the same time and respect. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. DarkDespair5 Posted: He’s asking you how can you prove its nonexistence if the vantage points available cannot reveal it. No, what he’s trying to do is play the faith card, and I’m not letting him. I’m going to keep hammering him until he gives up. He will either admit that the logically impossible cannot be, or he will admit that he has a cartoon view of reality. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. DarkDespair5 Posted: Not if some popular scientific hypotheses are correct. No, it’s called science fiction for a reason. DarkDespair5 Posted: Small apparent variations in the cosmological constant could be due to folds in space/time. The distances could be tremendous – millions of light-years could cause an alteration so large it would cease to resemble our current location. Yet it would still be part of the universe. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: Here I drew a square circle: No, you drew a line. Please demonstrate that you can have an equilateral quadrilateral with all interior angles as right angles also be the locus of all points equidistant from a central point at the same time and respect. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: Thanks for proving my point for me. Rather, you proved my point by dodging. You know that it’s logically impossible to have a square circle. Why you will not admit that is….something you have to deal with. Hobart Bliggity Posted: Neither of us can conclusively prove the other wrong. Oh it’s not that; it’s that you believe that faith trumps everything. Faith is a cop-out. Hobart Bliggity Posted: You have your definitions And that’s all I need. The logically impossible cannot exist, as it is also metaphysically impossible (though the reverse need not be true). A ball cannot be all red and all green at the same time and respect. That you wish to substitute some cartoon for reality is your problem. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: question was I answered it. Now then, show me how you can have an object which is an equilateral quadrilateral with all interior angles as right angles also be the locus of all points equidistant from a central point at the same time. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: If your only vantage point of my square circle was from dead-on the z-axis, could you prove that I hadn’t drawn one? Please demonstrate that you can have something that is an equilateral quadrilateral with all interior angles as right angles also be the locus of all points equidistant from a central point at the same time. I know you will dodge that. It’s fun to watch you dodge. I’m loving it. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. I answered your question. Why must you lie and say I haven’t? (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. BirdofPrey Posted: oh i dunno maybe it was the past 50 posts where you’ve so glibly uttered, with complete certainty, statements about existence and the universe that you may as well have pulled out of your bum? IOW: you are a poseur as well. Figures. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. BirdofPrey Posted: lmfao look at this guy. i can barely believe it lmao, look at that troll! I can barely believe it! Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! I can make nonsense posts too! (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. DarkDespair5 Posted: What about folds in space/time that would allow continuity and yet altered laws of physics? That’s science fiction. DarkDespair5 Posted: If the universe folds upon itself, several constants of the universe would cease to be constant at long distances. But we’re not talking about long distances, are we? (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: Other than the “Oh **** I dont know how to answer that I’ll just make something up to change the subject” rules. Yes, that’s precisely what you’re doing. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: How is a circle not still a circle when viewed from the side? Because we’re talking about the definition, little one. What arbitrariness are you trying to impose here? (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. DarkDespair5 Posted: He means rotating these 2D shapes in a 3D field so that they both look linear. Irrelevant, though, especially since they are 2D shapes with specific definitions. I want to see how he can make a square circle, given that the definitions of each preclude it. Clearly, you can’t have something be both an equilateral quadrilateral with all interior angles as right angles and also be the locus of all points equidistant from a central point at the same time. It’s just not possible. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: If you can set arbitrary constraints on the universe I’m not. Please don’t try to impose your fantasy on the universe. (view post)	12/07/2008
	God doesn't exist you fools. Hobart Bliggity Posted: If you viewed a square and a circle along the z-axis Squares and circles are 2D, not 3D. Try again. (view post)	12/07/2008

« previous
1
... 9
10
11
12
13
... 16
next »

0 Assholes Online | Full Screen | Close Chat

Internet Delay Chat

Have fun playing!

To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!