DarkArmy Posted:

I man with a gapping bumhole is perfectly fine but a girl in a dress dancing near a pole is completely uncalled for. Yeah that makes complete sense.

goatse… adult. presumably consenting since he’s doing it to himself

child dancing on a pole… child. illegal when “sexualized”. the image itself is fine and dandy and not at all sexual. combine it with that description and it becomes sexualized.

regardless, cz is at risk if they let those be published. it’s their game, their rules, their decision, ultimately.

DarkArmy Posted:

You should have eliminated the idea to begin with. “The latest exercise sensation; get the body of a stripper by dancing like one, and make extra money by letting your daddy’s friends watch!”

Daddy’s friend implies a child.

or, you know, 18 or 19 or in the category of “barely legal”

but I’ll agree that the description is poorly written. but a poorly written description does not justify cp being suddenly ok.