Buy Official Merchandise!
Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion
Bug - 3 -100 votes?

wtfmcnuggets

Avatar: 104315 Sat Apr 11 13:02:16 -0400 2009
34

[The Scrotal Safety-
Commission
]

Level 40 Troll

i finally grew a male reproductive organ

i was just voting in itembuildr and these two entries showed up as -100 after i voted on them.

Log in to see images!

are they disqualified or something? or is this a bug?

MC Banhammer

Avatar: 1887 2011-07-31 00:40:59 -0400
36

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Troll

Trying to create drama to drum up the ratings by any means necessary!

The first two are basically CP (when combined with the text). The submitters are lucky they didn’t get banned for them.

MC Banhammer edited this message on 06/23/2009 3:46PM

man-man

Avatar: 156485 2010-01-24 16:36:14 -0500
24

[Harem and Sushi Bar]

Level 69 Hacker

Selfish fine upstanding member of society

Wait… accompanying text can turn a perfectly clean picture of a child into potential-CP?

I’ll grant you that it’s of poor taste to use images of random children for this kind of item, but I’m not seeing the CP angle. Unless there’s some clause of Canadian law that says (or implies) that if you take a picture of some toddler playing with a pole, then caption it “pole dancing stripper”, it becomes CP by bumociation.

If that’s the case then the law is ****ed up… but there’s not a lot you can do about that. If it’s not the law that’s the problem, then I would want some justification for calling it CP. The children in question are fully clothed after all.

ChilePepino

Avatar: 101005 2010-01-24 16:17:40 -0500
5

[Full of SbumSS]

Level 35 Permanoob

Well, spf357 really rocks.

Maybe not CP, but still had to be eliminated.

man-man

Avatar: 156485 2010-01-24 16:36:14 -0500
24

[Harem and Sushi Bar]

Level 69 Hacker

Selfish fine upstanding member of society

ChilePepino Posted:

Maybe not CP, but still had to be eliminated.

Maybe, the question is why – the stated reason is that they’re “basically CP”, which I question. If they are in fact CP-like enough to be dodgy by the applicable law, then fair enough, but if not then the question of why they have to be eliminated stands open.

MC Banhammer

Avatar: 1887 2011-07-31 00:40:59 -0400
36

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Troll

Trying to create drama to drum up the ratings by any means necessary!

The concern is indeed the law and, presumably, how it would be interpreted. Both JB and ET reacted strongly negatively when I pointed out the submissions to them.

man-man

Avatar: 156485 2010-01-24 16:36:14 -0500
24

[Harem and Sushi Bar]

Level 69 Hacker

Selfish fine upstanding member of society

Log in to see images! Laws are dumb. Especially around the whole area of children and protection thereof.

Can’t criticise Canada particularly though, I’m living in the wonderful UK, where… I’m not sure, are drawings of fictional children still allowed to be nude here? I lose track of exactly how far gone down the road of stupid legislation we are.

DarkArmy

Avatar: 168859 Thu Jul 23 14:34:06 -0400 2009
6

Level 35 Hacker

“43 4f 44 45 20 4d 41 53 54 45 52”

MC Banhammer Posted:

The concern is indeed the law and, presumably, how it would be interpreted. Both JB and ET reacted strongly negatively when I pointed out the submissions to them.

I man with a gapping bumhole is perfectly fine but a girl in a dress dancing near a pole is completely uncalled for. Yeah that makes complete sense.

You should have eliminated the idea to begin with. “The latest exercise sensation; get the body of a stripper by dancing like one, and make extra money by letting your daddy’s friends watch!”

Daddy’s friend implies a child.

Seems more like a outright attack on a single person than an entry.

Your mods can make slanderous remarks and threaten give out email addresses and IP addresses and it completely fine.

Post this image and instantly you are the plague…

You need to push away from the computer and look at the real world once.

spacekadt

MODERATOR
Avatar: 16186 2011-11-01 00:02:40 -0400
81

[Brainfreeze]

Level 69 Camwhore

meh

DarkArmy Posted:

I man with a gapping bumhole is perfectly fine but a girl in a dress dancing near a pole is completely uncalled for. Yeah that makes complete sense.

goatse… adult. presumably consenting since he’s doing it to himself

child dancing on a pole… child. illegal when “sexualized”. the image itself is fine and dandy and not at all sexual. combine it with that description and it becomes sexualized.

regardless, cz is at risk if they let those be published. it’s their game, their rules, their decision, ultimately.

DarkArmy Posted:

You should have eliminated the idea to begin with. “The latest exercise sensation; get the body of a stripper by dancing like one, and make extra money by letting your daddy’s friends watch!”

Daddy’s friend implies a child.

or, you know, 18 or 19 or in the category of “barely legal”

but I’ll agree that the description is poorly written. but a poorly written description does not justify cp being suddenly ok.

MC Banhammer

Avatar: 1887 2011-07-31 00:40:59 -0400
36

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Troll

Trying to create drama to drum up the ratings by any means necessary!

DarkArmy Posted:

You need to push away from the computer and look at the real world once.

We do. That’s exactly why those images were a problem.

So perhaps it’s not us who need to “push away from the computer and look at the real world once”.

TUBSWEETIE

Avatar: 3450 2011-07-31 00:45:06 -0400
28

[And The Banned Pla-
yed On
]

Level 37 Troll

MY MEMORY IS THAT OF A SMALL GRAPE

the moral of the story is: if you owned a website and could go to jail over something as lame as a picture of a fully clothed child, you wouldn’t want that to happen.

and you would moderate your site’s user-submitted content to reflect that.

TUBSWEETIE edited this message on 06/24/2009 12:48AM

Inertia

Avatar: 60995 Fri Apr 03 12:59:05 -0400 2009
34

[Shii is gay]

Level 35 Troll

also wow i have no male reproductive organ

What about Lil’ Pony Groomers
lots of suggestive materials there

Johnny Mac

Avatar: 37704 2022-12-12 08:49:44 +0000
66

[Full of SbumSS]

Level 60 Troll

I grant you an bumhole x

Inertia Posted:

What about Lil’ Pony Groomers
lots of suggestive materials there


There’s a big difference between suggestive text and a suggestive image.

Inertia

Avatar: 60995 Fri Apr 03 12:59:05 -0400 2009
34

[Shii is gay]

Level 35 Troll

also wow i have no male reproductive organ

Johnny Mac Posted:

There’s a big difference between suggestive text and a suggestive image.

there are avatars depicting children in that forum

Dunatis

Avatar: 78885 2011-11-01 01:20:41 -0400
100

[Cabal Gamez]

Level 69 Hacker

Richard Whittington

Which is the Avatar which shows the man holding a child and covering her mouth with his hand? What about the custom text in Traditional Childrearing Forums that says “If you tell anyone, I’ll kill you”. Let’s not even get started with INCIT entries, and those wins are saved for posterity.

Speaking of which, my arguement boils down to this. http://forumwarz.com/incit/view/92205

DarkArmy

Avatar: 168859 Thu Jul 23 14:34:06 -0400 2009
6

Level 35 Hacker

“43 4f 44 45 20 4d 41 53 54 45 52”

spacekadt Posted:

or, you know, 18 or 19 or in the category of “barely legal”

but I’ll agree that the description is poorly written. but a poorly written description does not justify cp being suddenly ok.

Its not CP. I dont really care its not my site, and if it was it would be more evenly objective not lopsided like it is now. You can thank your current mod staff for that.

DarkArmy

Avatar: 168859 Thu Jul 23 14:34:06 -0400 2009
6

Level 35 Hacker

“43 4f 44 45 20 4d 41 53 54 45 52”

Dunatis Posted:

Which is the Avatar which shows the man holding a child and covering her mouth with his hand? What about the custom text in Traditional Childrearing Forums that says “If you tell anyone, I’ll kill you”. Let’s not even get started with INCIT entries, and those wins are saved for posterity.

Speaking of which, my arguement boils down to this. http://forumwarz.com/incit/view/9220

PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THE RULES ARE ONLY FOR A CERTAIN FEW

MOD EDIT: User banned for this allcaps post in CD.

DarkArmy was banned for this post by Nicco

DarkArmy edited this message on 07/23/2009 2:25PM

DarkArmy

Avatar: 168859 Thu Jul 23 14:34:06 -0400 2009
6

Level 35 Hacker

“43 4f 44 45 20 4d 41 53 54 45 52”

Your mods can make slanderous remarks and threaten give out email addresses and IP addresses and it completely fine.

WHY DID NO MOD COMMENT ON THIS…. Because its true!!

kittiejenn

Avatar: 18080 2011-11-01 00:29:42 -0400
39

[Backdoor Amigos]

Level 35 Emo Kid

So damn naughty it wraps back around to nice.

DarkArmy Posted:

Your mods can make slanderous remarks and threaten give out email addresses and IP addresses and it completely fine.

WHY DID NO MOD COMMENT ON THIS…. Because its true!!

What are you talking about?

Inertia

Avatar: 60995 Fri Apr 03 12:59:05 -0400 2009
34

[Shii is gay]

Level 35 Troll

also wow i have no male reproductive organ

lol is all-capsing in gd still bannable?

oh wait this is buildr, go on

Inertia edited this message on 06/24/2009 9:20AM
Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!