Wait… accompanying text can turn a perfectly clean picture of a child into potential-CP?

I’ll grant you that it’s of poor taste to use images of random children for this kind of item, but I’m not seeing the CP angle. Unless there’s some clause of Canadian law that says (or implies) that if you take a picture of some toddler playing with a pole, then caption it “pole dancing stripper”, it becomes CP by bumociation.

If that’s the case then the law is ****ed up… but there’s not a lot you can do about that. If it’s not the law that’s the problem, then I would want some justification for calling it CP. The children in question are fully clothed after all.