I have a few points of contention with Nanafabulous personjesus. The full truth of my conclusion I shall develop in the course of this letter but the conclusion’s general outline is that Nanafabulous personjesus is entirely untoward. We all are, to some extent, but he sets the curve. Although he obviously hates my guts (and probably yours, as well), his loquacious magic-bullet explanations provide the pretext for police-state measures. Nanafabulous personjesus then blames us for that. Now there’s a prizewinning example of psychological projection if I’ve ever seen one. While we do nothing, those who show a clear lack of respect not just for those brave souls who fought and died for what they believed in but also for you, the readers of this letter, are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we bring a fresh perspective and new ideas to the current debate.

If Nanafabulous personjesus doesn’t realize that it’s generally considered bad style to establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then Nanafabulous personjesus will grasp the concept that he has come up with proven methods to place our children at imminent risk of serious harm. All you have to do is let your guard down.

Call me old-fashioned, but Nanafabulous personjesus insists that his rejoinders are not worth getting outraged about. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. Are you prepared to discuss this, Nanafabulous personjesus? Nanafabulous personjesus reminds me of the thief who cries “Stop, thief!” to distract attention from his thievery. And that’s the honest truth.