PS FOSSILS WERE CREATED BY GOD TO TEST OUR FAITH IT SAYS SO IN THE BIBLE

­

Velveteen Posted:

given enough time, isn’t it statistically possible that a house would be built by the immortal happy dog and the materials impervious to decay? given enough time, isn’t it inevitable?

no. a hammer randomly swinging around cannot bumemble the house, even with an infinite amount of time. You’re stupid and doomed to hell, good day sir

Velveteen Posted:

how can you be sure? all walking around small, nail flies through a couple of boards…

tell me physically how it could occur, step by step. as you try, it will become clear to you how idiotic your comment was.

how does one describe something random step by step?

velveteen you’re actually kind of dumb

I DONT THINK YOU UNDERSTAND NATURAL SELECTION

Velveteen Posted:

thinking is hard.

i thnk thsi thred broke my brain!Log in to see images!

BirdofPrey Posted:

tell me physically how it could occur, step by step. as you try, it will become clear to you how idiotic your comment was.

Velveteen Posted:

given enough time, isn’t it statistically possible that a house would be built by the immortal happy dog and the materials impervious to decay? given enough time, isn’t it inevitable?

No, because the dog would be more likely to break things than bumemble more parts once 2 parts go together.

The anology is flawed, because BoP is a lazy troll and can’t even copypasta good arguements. Seriously, you can do better than that christfabulous person, if you’re gonna copy something, don’t make it a flawed anology.

Even if the parts didn’t fall apart afterwards he’d never make a house because he’s just hammering. Whereas evolution is more, if he gets two parts right they will not fall from subsequent hammering. Also once a few random nails are in, a builder who can dig appears, and as more happens more people appear to do the other roles. Also if it’s done wrong, the bits dissbumemble, good as new after a while. And the bits last a stupidly long time, perhaps even foreevr. Also there’s potentially millions of these scenarios, with different dogs and builders.

The old analogy didn’t reflect the terms evolution works on. It’s like saying “your theory is wrong, because if I change it a bit it makes no sense”. Well no ****.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tame_Silver_Fox

Evolution may not be the cause of our existance, but it’s been proven. And for a lengthy process, I’d say taking 50 years is pretty good.

BirdofPrey Posted:

In all seriousness though, almost everyone who replied to this thread is borderline very special

ITT: 6 PAGES OF BEING TROLLED

narth Posted:

Dunno, I think it’s more some very bored posters and some people taking it IC.

I mean. Well done. Masterfully played. Bet you’re all so proud.

yep. It was a lame troll too. I was hoping by supporting the underdog you might have to do something clever rather than copypasta though. Sadly. Fail.

i was playing this thread seriously until page 3 or so, when i got bored with it myself, but people continued to post in it. still awaiting the day when you stop commenting bland bystander **** and actually post something that isn’t boring as hell (this will probably never happen. p.s. mai is an internet whore)