Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion
Fix It INCIT's dead (and how to fix it)

genericusr

Avatar: Hacker Man w/ Goggles
5

Level 69 Hacker

“Trojan Horse Magnum”

Currently, INCIT frequently just stops with not enough entries, with this nearly always happening;

1. 5 players are playing.

2. One guy leaves.

3. HAHA SCREW YOU WE NEED 5 SUBMISSIONS

4. The rest are stuck waiting for another person to join.

5. Another guy gets bored and leaves.

6. Repeat 3 and 4 until no players are left.

7. No players online, chance of new game starting nearly zero.

What you could do: Lower the player limit to 3- while this makes for some lame rounds, it would also make more people join, expecting to be able to play.

(You could also limit the scoops from being awarded when less than 5 people participated, to keep Domination fair.)

SanDyk

Avatar: 175636 2012-01-01 09:50:12 -0500
21

[Grey Goose Mafiosi]

Level 69 Troll

I am the internet equivelent of Jon Stewart! Except less funny...

whoa a “lets improve incit” thread. I’ve never seen that been done before

AIDS woman's genitals

Avatar: 184403 2009-09-17 04:10:15 -0400
25

Level 69 Troll

show me your zucchini and I'll show you my cugreat timesber :zak:

genericusr Posted:

Currently, INCIT frequently just stops with not enough entries, with this nearly always happening;

1. 5 players are playing.

2. One guy leaves.

3. HAHA SCREW YOU WE NEED 5 SUBMISSIONS

4. The rest are stuck waiting for another person to join.

5. Another guy gets bored and leaves.

6. Repeat 3 and 4 until no players are left.

7. No players online, chance of new game starting nearly zero.

What you could do: Lower the player limit to 3- while this makes for some lame rounds, it would also make more people join, expecting to be able to play.

(You could also limit the scoops from being awarded when less than 5 people participated, to keep Domination fair.)

Maybe increase the incentive to play it?

SanDyk Posted:

whoa a “lets improve incit” thread. I’ve never seen that been done before

That’s not a helpful attitude is it.

swine

Avatar: 10221 2011-10-31 21:15:57 -0400
28

[Harem and Sushi Bar]

Level 69 Troll

I congratulate you in recognising my superiority and choosing me to be your love pig!

Posting to point out op is most likely a GHAX alt.

AIDS woman's genitals

Avatar: 184403 2009-09-17 04:10:15 -0400
25

Level 69 Troll

show me your zucchini and I'll show you my cugreat timesber :zak:

swine Posted:

Posting to point out op is most likely a GHAX alt.

Why do think this?

BobTheSqueak-
yWeasel

Avatar: 63475 2010-04-01 02:14:05 -0400
26

Level 69 Emo Kid

“The Infinite Sadness”

swine

Avatar: 10221 2011-10-31 21:15:57 -0400
28

[Harem and Sushi Bar]

Level 69 Troll

I congratulate you in recognising my superiority and choosing me to be your love pig!

AIDS woman's genitals Posted:

Why do think this?

Just the “generic” pattern and caring about INCIT.

AIDS woman's genitals

Avatar: 184403 2009-09-17 04:10:15 -0400
25

Level 69 Troll

show me your zucchini and I'll show you my cugreat timesber :zak:

swine Posted:

Just the “generic” pattern and caring about INCIT.

There is no way he could be a ghax alt. He has only made one thread and 6 posts.

SuperSonic

Avatar: 148701 2010-01-03 11:24:25 -0500
21

[WeChall]

Level 43 Hacker

“Backdoor Bob”

genericusr Posted:

Currently, INCIT frequently just stops with not enough entries, with this nearly always happening;

1. 5 players are playing.

2. One guy leaves.

3. HAHA SCREW YOU WE NEED 5 SUBMISSIONS

4. The rest are stuck waiting for another person to join.

5. Another guy gets bored and leaves.

6. Repeat 3 and 4 until no players are left.

7. No players online, chance of new game starting nearly zero.

What you could do: Lower the player limit to 3- while this makes for some lame rounds, it would also make more people join, expecting to be able to play.

(You could also limit the scoops from being awarded when less than 5 people participated, to keep Domination fair.)

Im speechless. Srsly. Last time I tried to express myself on a similar thread, I got banned.

sdgrbbum09

Avatar: 165234 2012-12-05 02:59:05 -0500
22

[A Beautiful Place -
Out in the Country
]

Level 69 Troll

I AM A BOVINE ****WAD

Either GET RID OF INCIT COMPLETELY BECAUSE IT’S NOT FUN or for now make it so that after 5 minutes voting is started with at least 3 subs. Of course someone would have to program that…

CHALKONEUPTO-
DALORD

Avatar: 49117 2011-10-31 03:55:43 -0400

[Harem and Sushi Bar]

Level 10 Camwhore

You should listen to the groovy trip-hop in my sig

genericusr Posted:

Currently

lol dumbbum

CHALKONEUPTODALORD was banned for this post by Catt although

OrsonScottCa-
rd

Avatar: 104768 2014-09-17 22:27:39 -0400
24

[Forumwarz Speakeasy]

Level 69 Hacker

P - E - D - O - S - E - X - U - A - L - !

While I agree with the sentiments, OP, the problem will then be “three people playing, one leaves, the other two get bored and quit, repeat”. IMO, the problems started when INCIT started moderating/blocking certain entries. Yes, “WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW” is not a legit entry, but letting people do it if they wanted to (and vote for it if they wanted to) encouraged them to stick around, chat on IDC, and attract other legitimate players to the chat and by extension to INCIT. When you get seven or eight people who are actually actively chatting, it becomes easy to get seven or eight more; when you only have five to begin with and they’re already bored, it’s much harder. INCIT should be more like WeChall: full of garbage players, but at least it’s active and there are a few diamonds in all that coal.

SuperSonic

Avatar: 148701 2010-01-03 11:24:25 -0500
21

[WeChall]

Level 43 Hacker

“Backdoor Bob”

CHALKONEUPTODALORD Posted:

BANNED

See?

ERECTILE_DEA-
TH

Avatar: 150883 2010-01-24 16:20:22 -0500
37

[SUPER SECRET MOON -
BASE PLANNING COMM-
ITTEE
]

Level 69 Troll

you still go on here you old **** just die already

SuperSonic Posted:

Im speechless. Srsly. Last time I tried to express myself on a similar thread, I got banned.

That’s because he has not yet proven himself to be a fabulous person and you have. On a fabulous person scale from 1 to 10 with 1 being Bruce Campbell and 10 being blowing a dude in the back of a 7/11 you would be blowing a dude behind the 7/11 while getting bumraped. This generic guy’s position on the fabulous person scale has yet to be determined.

The fabulous person scale is how they determine the likelihood of you being banned for a specific post over a different poster of a different fabulous person level. It’s the most scientific way possible to gauge ban severity so deal with it and let the mods do their jobs.

ERECTILE_DEATH was banned for this post by Nicco

SuperSonic

Avatar: 148701 2010-01-03 11:24:25 -0500
21

[WeChall]

Level 43 Hacker

“Backdoor Bob”

ERECTILE_DEATH Posted:

That’s because he has not yet proven himself to be a fabulous person and you have. On a fabulous person scale from 1 to 10 with 1 being Bruce Campbell and 10 being blowing a dude in the back of a 7/11 you would be blowing a dude behind the 7/11 while getting bumraped. This generic guy’s position on the fabulous person scale has yet to be determined.

The fabulous person scale is how they determine the likelihood of you being banned for a specific post over a different poster of a different fabulous person level. It’s the most scientific way possible to gauge ban severity so deal with it and let the mods do their jobs.

tl;dr: e_death testing out his new theory, with himself as an example.

SuperSonic was banned for this post by Aldo_Anything

SuperSonic edited this message on 05/26/2010 12:22PM

Catt although

MODERATOR
Avatar: 46806 2013-08-07 00:24:18 -0400
115

[Brainfreeze]

Level 69 Troll

Last Catt Standing

SuperSonic Posted:

See?

No, not at all, actually

SanDyk

Avatar: 175636 2012-01-01 09:50:12 -0500
21

[Grey Goose Mafiosi]

Level 69 Troll

I am the internet equivelent of Jon Stewart! Except less funny...

If they bring back WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW I will probably play incit again

OrsonScottCa-
rd

Avatar: 104768 2014-09-17 22:27:39 -0400
24

[Forumwarz Speakeasy]

Level 69 Hacker

P - E - D - O - S - E - X - U - A - L - !

SanDyk Posted:

If they bring back WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW I will probably play incit again

I’ve heard that from several people, actually.

Patently Chi-
ll Prestidig-
itator

Avatar: 128746 2011-10-09 04:24:59 -0400
8

[love is a dog from-
hell
]

Level 69 Troll

Celerysteve is incredible... he is just so... so incredible.

i still wouldn’t, tbh. i’ve just gotten used to see incit as another feature that i will never use, like i do with my phones currency converter

BobTheSqueakyWeasel Posted:

Better solution here.

This is not a solution.

This sort of “solution” reminds me of a situation that involves killing the poor to reduce poverty.

Mod Edit: On second thought, this post is ok and the ban was lifted.

The nerd o powa was banned for this post by Sergeant Cid

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!