Wylin Posted:

Well, how do both of these klans end up cooler than yours if that’s the case?

all perspective

and you have the perspective of an unfunny fabulous person

it’s obvious that you simply don’t understand our use of higher forms of humor Log in to see images!

nanafabulous personjesus Posted:

Log in to see images!

^EXAMPLE OF HIGHER FORM OF HUMOR

I think maybe you should get high, then post. please.

Let’s bring it back on topic. Remember it’s all about ME! Erm, I mean the sisterhood. Yes. Exactly. The Sisterhood. We are still here, we are still fabulous and we still have extremely hot racks. Trust me.

Log in to see images!

Balloon Posted:

Are we actually trying to get through to Team Shortbus?

Attempts at a constructive topic with them like teaching their mom’s not to be ****s. It’s easier just to say whatevar.

It sure would be nice though. Maybe if we repeat things alot like they do we might start to get through to them?

Wylin Posted:

It sure would be nice though. Maybe if we repeat things alot like they do we might start to get through to them?

So we’re getting through to you that you’re a bundle of fabulous persons?

WE WIN!

Let me begin this letter with a few simple statements of fact. First fact: Sometimes, the most purblind prima donnas you’ll ever see are so inerudite, they merit special attention. Second fact: Nanafabulous personjesus favors a froward “Code of Conduct” that serves no purpose other than to needle and wheedle morally repugnant spongers into Nanafabulous personjesus’s coalition of frightful spoilsports and snappish paper-pushers. Third fact: Only by striving to tell Nanafabulous personjesus where he can stick it can I build a society in which people have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and uncertainty. These three facts bear repeating over and over again. They are simple and self-evident but it is easy to forget them in the blizzard of lies and obfuscation coming from Nanafabulous personjesus and his backers these days. Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone’s opinions, nor do I intend to demean Nanafabulous personjesus personally for his beliefs or worldviews. But I do think that I must take personal action and arraign Nanafabulous personjesus at the tribunal of public opinion.

I, for one, sincerely suspect that I’m not sure whether to clbumify Nanafabulous personjesus’s bromides under “paranoia” or “ignorance”. Deal with it. The objection may still be raised that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. At first glance this sounds almost believable yet the following must be borne in mind: Nanafabulous personjesus may be reasonably cunning with words. However, he is completely quasi-illiterate with everything else.

What do you think the chances are that Nanafabulous personjesus will eventually stop turning clowns loose against us good citizens? I bumure you, the likelihood of that is slim to none. The reason is that Nanafabulous personjesus keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that at birth every living being is bumigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum. The purpose of this deception may be to bring about a wonderland of racism. Or maybe the purpose is to distract attention from more important issues. Oh what a tangled web Nanafabulous personjesus weaves when first he practices to deceive. This is a stark reality that no impartial analyst can choose to ignore. Although others may disagree with that claim, few would dispute that if he were to use more accessible language then a larger number of people would be able to understand what he’s saying. The downside for Nanafabulous personjesus, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that he is squarely in favor of antipluralism and its propensity to use terms of opprobrium such as “dangerous suborners of perjury” and “rummy, mendacious wonks” to castigate whomever he opposes. This is so typical of Nanafabulous personjesus: he condemns bigotry and injustice except when it benefits him personally. Before you read this letter, you might have thought that Nanafabulous personjesus should put blinkered thoughts in our children’s minds because “it’s the right thing to do”. Now you know that I have resisted taking legal action against him, as others have advised me to do.

The Cheat Posted:

Let me begin this letter with a few simple statements of fact. First fact: Sometimes, the most purblind prima donnas you’ll ever see are so inerudite, they merit special attention. Second fact: Nanafabulous personjesus favors a froward “Code of Conduct” that serves no purpose other than to needle and wheedle morally repugnant spongers into Nanafabulous personjesus’s coalition of frightful spoilsports and snappish paper-pushers. Third fact: Only by striving to tell Nanafabulous personjesus where he can stick it can I build a society in which people have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and uncertainty. These three facts bear repeating over and over again. They are simple and self-evident but it is easy to forget them in the blizzard of lies and obfuscation coming from Nanafabulous personjesus and his backers these days. Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone’s opinions, nor do I intend to demean Nanafabulous personjesus personally for his beliefs or worldviews. But I do think that I must take personal action and arraign Nanafabulous personjesus at the tribunal of public opinion.

I, for one, sincerely suspect that I’m not sure whether to clbumify Nanafabulous personjesus’s bromides under “paranoia” or “ignorance”. Deal with it. The objection may still be raised that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. At first glance this sounds almost believable yet the following must be borne in mind: Nanafabulous personjesus may be reasonably cunning with words. However, he is completely quasi-illiterate with everything else.

What do you think the chances are that Nanafabulous personjesus will eventually stop turning clowns loose against us good citizens? I bumure you, the likelihood of that is slim to none. The reason is that Nanafabulous personjesus keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that at birth every living being is bumigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum. The purpose of this deception may be to bring about a wonderland of racism. Or maybe the purpose is to distract attention from more important issues. Oh what a tangled web Nanafabulous personjesus weaves when first he practices to deceive. This is a stark reality that no impartial analyst can choose to ignore. Although others may disagree with that claim, few would dispute that if he were to use more accessible language then a larger number of people would be able to understand what he’s saying. The downside for Nanafabulous personjesus, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that he is squarely in favor of antipluralism and its propensity to use terms of opprobrium such as “dangerous suborners of perjury” and “rummy, mendacious wonks” to castigate whomever he opposes. This is so typical of Nanafabulous personjesus: he condemns bigotry and injustice except when it benefits him personally. Before you read this letter, you might have thought that Nanafabulous personjesus should put blinkered thoughts in our children’s minds because “it’s the right thing to do”. Now you know that I have resisted taking legal action against him, as others have advised me to do.

For those whose attention span is too short to read the previous, I have decoded the hidden message within.

Oh, and the cheat, no one cares if you can use the ‘find and replace’ tool in microsoft word.

who are you and how did you find the picture of my boyscout inauguration