You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
- « previous
- 1
- ... 5
- 6
- 7
- « next
Why is Fie banned? | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fingerz Posted: |
||||||
Posted On: 09/23/2009 11:11PM | View Jalapeno Bootyho...'s Profile | # | ||||||
|
Jalapeno Bootyhole Posted:
Good call, imo. |
||||||
Posted On: 09/23/2009 11:13PM | View Fingerz's Profile | # | ||||||
|
hey good idea, put a peen on snitching instead of putting it on phineas contest. |
||||||
Posted On: 09/24/2009 1:03AM | View ChilePepino's Profile | # | ||||||
|
ChilePepino Posted:
I’d totally whore that peen up Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 09/24/2009 2:03AM | View Dunatis's Profile | # | ||||||
|
i like the no mr bond i expect you to even though i dont like WWWWWW |
||||||
Posted On: 09/24/2009 9:18AM | View cya's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Chawin Posted:
I admit it was kinda funny, but the same player made a bunch of other Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 09/24/2009 9:56AM | View Jalapeno Bootyho...'s Profile | # | ||||||
|
i am deeply upset and hurt from this news ): |
||||||
Posted On: 09/24/2009 9:58AM | View cya's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Jalapeno Bootyhole Posted:
Scale votes by the history of prior winning votes. I.e., people who routinely vote for winners have bigger votes than people who routinely vote for losers. This is vaguely similar to the Google PageRank algorithm — pages that largely link to relevant pages are strong indicators of relevance. A result in voting is then the sum of the weights of the names who voted for a submission.
A user who dumpvotes is then reducing their ability to reinforce spamming behaviour. It’s less draconian than banning a dumpvoter, but asymptotically reduces their ability to distort the outcome to whatever “good decision rate” they establish. It establishes a new equilibrium point in the game/meta-game combination where voting for winners is an improved long-term strategy than the current game/meta-game combo.
Recommendations in an implementation:
Open questions:
Or does someone have a better idea? |
||||||
Posted On: 09/26/2009 7:10PM | View fuzzyeric's Profile | # | ||||||
|
http://www.forumwarz.com/incit/view/123936
I AM COMPLETELY REFORMED AND TRUSTWORTHY
I am totally working for you know Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 09/29/2009 2:17PM | View Master_Troll's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Master_Troll Posted: |
||||||
Posted On: 09/29/2009 3:16PM | View Fingerz's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Fingerz Posted: |
||||||
Posted On: 09/30/2009 9:14AM | View Jalapeno Bootyho...'s Profile | # | ||||||
|
Jalapeno Bootyhole Posted:
This thread should be stickied and reserved for snitching from now on Log in to see images! Would be fun to read and participate in, imo. |
||||||
Posted On: 10/01/2009 12:18AM | View Fingerz's Profile | # | ||||||
|
fuzzyeric Posted: The problem I’m immediately seeing here is that this would punish anyone with a sense of humour that differs from the other people in the room – they see the choices, genuinely pick the one they find funniest, and lose voting power because no-one else agrees with them.
Whenever I play INCIT it seems like the ones I find least funny are getting the most votes. Maybe there’s dumpvoting at work here, but I suspect people just find things funny that I think are ****. Increasing your vote’s weight by how often you agree with others is just an incentive to vote along predictable lines – try to guess what everyone else will vote for and jump on the wagon, instead of voting for what you actually find funny.
That said, I don’t have a better suggestion. There’s really no way to force people to vote honestly for what they find funniest – so long as there’s rewards attached there will be ways to game the system (including the system you described – for example, get a small group together and all vote the same way to make that sub win, having voted for the winner the weight of the group’s votes increases and it only becomes easier to control the outcome, and hence increase your voting weight further) |
||||||
Posted On: 10/02/2009 7:27PM | View man-man's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Log in to see images!
merc was spamming incite |
||||||
Posted On: 10/02/2009 10:01PM | View Fie's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Quis molestat ipsos molestiae
Hmm… Who annoys the annoyers themselves? Ah.
Who trolls the trolls?
<snerk> |
||||||
Posted On: 10/04/2009 1:55PM | View fuzzyeric's Profile | # | ||||||
Chawin Posted:
I would say that sort of thing is an inside joke, and not spamming. |
|||||||
Posted On: 10/04/2009 2:18PM | View NeoVid's Profile | # | ||||||
|
You troll the trolls by +m’ing them. The IRC version of “ban”, because it technically lets them read FB/etc. DarkDespair5 edited this message on 10/04/2009 2:21PM |
||||||
Posted On: 10/04/2009 2:20PM | View DarkDespair5's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Honest question here, why is Fie banned (again)? |
||||||
Posted On: 10/04/2009 8:18PM | View Sarcasm Inc's Profile | # | ||||||
- « previous
- 1
- ... 5
- 6
- 7
- « next