Raepdog Posted:

I was making a valid point, though I would probably just have my child cut because I don’t want to have to buy some dildo contraption to teach him how to clean his or get a book or something due to my lack of foreskin to teach him.

fair enough but your posts were cryptic imo.

anyway i doubt it’s that hard to figure out.

it’s all personal opinion and mine is that i’d rather have to figure it out and not cut my kid than be lazy and just do it for convenience.

not something i would ever expect myself to say. weird. convenience > all except a few cirgreat timesstances. @zing

The sensitivity thing isn’t necessarily BS as I remember being rather uncomfortable feeling the head flopping around after I was cut until I got used to it. But even if that does apply to during sex, it doesn’t make it feel bad and would help you last a bit longer in theory and somehow I doubt that to be a problem.

Bandaney Posted:

I think cirgreat timescised male reproductive organes are by far better looking.

Well you’re in luck. Log in to see images!

I’m cut and I like it that way.

baou30 Posted:

I’m not, though I wish I were. Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

Easy enough to fix. Could be about $2000, though.

Also, why? We’re only cirgreat timescising about 40% of newborns in the U.S. these days, and in I’m told uncut is the standard in Europe. Some ladies prefer one way or the other, but I’d imagine it’s no more a deal-breaker than the relative size of a woman’s labia minora.

markchd edited this message on 05/24/2009 6:07PM

To be really honest, I wouldn’t really care if my parents decided or not to cirgreat timessize me at early ages, because to me, women just really care on how you use your male reproductive organ. So, the extra/missing skin is not a really important point.

Rage_**** Posted:

To be really honest, I wouldn’t really care if my parents decided or not to cirgreat timessize me at early ages, because to me, women just really care on how you use your male reproductive organ. So, the extra/missing skin is not a really important point.

Yeah, I’ve had experience with both and personally, I don’t care all that much if they’re snipsville or not. It’s the captain of the vessel more than the anything else. And yeah, regular showering fends off most nastiness.

oh, wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_effects_of_cirgreat timescision

This debate is coke vs pepsi, but with all the pbumion that male insecurity brings.

Here’s a brief checklist for you if you feel like you’re missing out on being cut/uncut

1)Is sex/masturbation/whatever satisfying for you?

2)Is it satisfying for your partner?

If you answered yes to both of these congratulations you have a good male reproductive organ.

If you answered no to either, find out what makes you/your partner tick and do that. If you have an unfulfilling sex life, it’s not because you have/don’t have a foreskin. There are a million other reasons that have way more of an impact.

tl;dr There is no difference aside from personal preference, so nobody is losing out on anything.

Acid Flux Posted:

...you’re a heterosexual male, and you own a silk shirt, you only bought that in an effort to increase your chances of getting laid.

In my defense, it did work. It was just $50 and feeling foolish for a night, though. I’d never have surgery just to increase my ****ability. It’s basically a boob job for guys at that point.

Rage_**** Posted:

To be really honest, I wouldn’t really care if my parents decided or not to cirgreat timessize me at early ages, because to me, women just really care on how you use your male reproductive organ. So, the extra/missing skin is not a really important point.

Also, WHEEEEEEE!!!

I find that women actually tend to prefer how you use your tongue to how you use your male reproductive organ Log in to see images!

Okay, Adapt, allow me to rephrase that.

“which ‘version’ gives you more of a chance to get laid more than once with the same girl”