You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
John Stossel's Flamebate Posts
View John Stossel's ProfileSearch Results | ||
---|---|---|
Cutting yourself!I am an IRL Emo kid with one IRL ER cut behind me.
And I threatened to cut myself over incit. But no-one voted for me
That is a good thing since I didn’t really mean it and offered to suck anyone’s male reproductive organ.
But what if someone meant it? I would be scared and cut myself!
Ps. I’m really drunk. Yeah Yeah I know itðs monday but I’m Emo. (view post) |
02/23/2009 | |
Regarding the new E-peen length systemNone approve of blackness? (view post) |
02/21/2009 | |
Is Episode II worth the money?MC Banhammer Posted: duh, but I am the hgihest in my dom team so I really do not want to play it this time. Fishined it on one of my altz. I would love to play it again on my original (this one) but I’d loose my streak and therefore probably my chances at getting my first medal. (view post) |
02/21/2009 | |
Is Episode II worth the money?Pavilion Posted:
Then get to freaking work! (view post) |
02/21/2009 | |
Is Episode II worth the money?It’s good but ruins your streak. That is the only problem.
Much better stores and sure it is fun too.
I’m waiting for Ep 3, when is it coming? (view post) |
02/21/2009 | |
Regarding the new E-peen length systemI have an insane suggestion.
When your E-peen reached the non medal maximum….
IT TURNS BLACK!!!! Log in to see images!
No fine upstanding member of society could pack more then 13” so… (view post) |
02/19/2009 | |
Who is this guy?Inertia Posted:
Because he was more successful then other Libertarian candidates. Finished second in Nevada and had decent support in many states.
And had a real grbumroots frenzy.
And if you thought that this was too long to read then you would not have the chance to read the bill for the economic stimulus package which was available int 10 copies to the senate and house combined, and released 24 hours before the vote and came in at the meager length of 1,000 pages. Which means that no one that did not have prior access to it could have physically read it in detail and judged it. And then Log in to see images! condemns nay votes. (view post) |
02/19/2009 | |
Raepdog Fanart Contest!Well I’m so good I could not claim originality. Log in to see images!
But it as pretty awesome with reapdog though, is your name Ishmael? (view post) |
02/18/2009 | |
Who is this guy?I certainly do not ignore it. Prejudice is a value loaded sentiment and according to Rothbard and me; Violence can only be justified on a value free bases.
And as soon as you include value laded sentiments into a political system it cannot be justified by means of logic. Because it cannot be demonstrated to be true when the value does not exist. Par Example if your political system requires you to give nickels to hobos it can only exists when there are hobos. When they don’t exist there can be no justification for including them, thus such a political system cannot be demonstrated to be true on Mars. Because there are no hobos on Mars. Now a political system to be true it must by applicable everywhere in all times and regardless of situations.
Now to give a more general justification of my stance:
Now if people hate hobos, not all of them because someone has to advocate a bill for forcing people to give them nickels. Then they are taking their value judgment and saying it is so superior to the value judgment that you should not help hobos that they can use violence to enforce their own value judgments. Now this can be turned around. The people that hate hobos now forbid the others by punishment to give nickels to hobos. Now you have the exact same thing, people enforcing their values upon others. Same happened to the Jews, in both the 3rd reich and the USSR. Your stance originates from what I can tell from a grave epistemological error. That you can judge the justness of an action from it’s results and it is easy to justify murder with that. And you can never judge the results from an action except in models where the results are pre-determined. Now however you can predict the direct results from your own actions, granted that you have the time to evaluate them. Thus libertarians advocate that you cannot initiate force but only respond to it. as in defending yourself. That leaves you with a political system where you cannot attack people for any reason. While the other stance leaves you with infinite (infinity does not exist, it is just as high as you can count but the point is very very very many, beyond your comprehension) political systems because you can change the value judgment to anything. – Now if you think you are better then other people fine. But if you think you are so good that you can force other people to bow to your will then you have completely destroyed the concept of equality from your political system. Because people cannot have equal rights if other people have the right to tell you what to do. Except if all people have that right and then you have no rights at all. Thus due to the inalienable god given rights (interchangeable with natural rights if you a heathen); which have been demonstrated to be true so many times that I shall take them for granted in this argument. Thus the only system that gives everyone equal rights is to allow everything except the initiation of force upon another being. Because if you allow all people the “right” to enforce their will with violence then there is no such thing as rights.
My position is that the only consistent way of granting everyone equal rights is giving them the right to do anything so long as they do not initiate force on other people. Now that does not mean they cannot have value judgments as you point out in your example; we all do. But do dismiss them as prejudice is perhaps right, but it isn’t a justification for forced charity. You are free to convincing them that your value judgment is right. Which then leads to a sort of market of pluralistic value judgments that compete. That is you can found a commune with a set of communistic rules and live there in peace. But you cannot horde people into your commune at gunpoint. But you are free to ask them and try convincing them to come. If you think you can horde them into your commune you are saying that your values are better. But apparently not good enough so you can convince other people of their goodness. Then you are stating that their logic is different from yours; that is superior. That is polylogicalism and is profoundly irrational and was practiced by the nazis and communist explicitly with their bourgeoisie truths, Jewish truth and Aryan truth. Then There can be no dialogue between groups and the only solution is to enforce your value. And in the case of the nazis with death camps.
The reason why that is wrong is because it is an improper definition of reason. Reason integrates man’s perceptions by means of forming abstractions or conceptions, thus raising man’s knowledge from the perceptual level, which he shares with animals, to the conceptual level, which he alone can reach. The method which reason employs in this process is logic—and logic is the art of non-contradictory identification. (Rand) because there is only one world which all groups perceive there is only one non-contradictory identification. Thus your political system has too by applicable to that reality and not a socially constructed (Hobos used earlier) phenomena. Which is the definition of a value judgment ANY value judgment.
In short:
Conservetism: Log in to see images! Socialism: Log in to see images! Communism: Log in to see images!
Libertarianism: Log in to see images!
There is a profound difference between Libertarianism and other political systems. While the others are not different in principle but only in scale.
Ps.
Libertarianism is a general term, in my usage it would be more accurate to identify it as Anarcho Capitalism where the government has the exact same rights as the populace, and because they are not allow to steal neither can the government do so with “taxation”. A more detailed definition of my stance would be the self coined Post-Anarcho-capitalistic-Institutional-Constructivism. Which is that government institutions are privatized (except for the Libertarian role of government) by handing them over to political parties which grant access to them for a taxational fee. While the right too libertarian role of government services are gained through signing a literal social contract which gives you the right to the services and obligates you to pay citizenship fees. Now if you don’t think you need it you don’t have to get citizenship and can lock yourself up in your house with your guns. But the police are then not obligated to help you against bandits. (view post) |
02/18/2009 | |
Obama E-peenOk, you get an E-peen for having voted for Obama.
Now, what about all us Ron Paul trolls? Log in to see images!
Ps.
Long live the victorious People’s war of world Libertarian revolution for the emancipation of the exploited majority!
Log in to see images! (view post) |
02/18/2009 | |
Who is this guy?Besides I’m Mormon we pack guns and food in our fallout shelter anyways. (view post) |
02/18/2009 | |
Who is this guy?1337xxxlolololxxx1337 Posted:
Not exactly Libertarians generally do not view charities badly. They are just opposed to forcing other people to help others.
So it should give disgust to anyone who thinks he can force his obligations of survival unto other people.
And that would be weakling fabulous persons. (according to Rand)
So long live the victorious people’s war of world libertarian revolution for the emancipation of the exploited majority!
Log in to see images! Log in to see images! Log in to see images! Log in to see images! Log in to see images! Log in to see images! Log in to see images! Log in to see images!
ps. Funny how you can apply Marxist terminology to Libertarianism. (view post) |
02/18/2009 | |
Bookmarklet to show which forums are currently in your streak.Someone grease monkey this ****. (view post) |
02/17/2009 | |
SaveBPNot exactly a competition but this has to do with giving BP points so I’ll put it here.
If you want to Buy a Custom Avatar for Someone Else, I’ll do it for 1 BP because I need to uncheat one of my altz. So You’ll save 2 BP by giving me one because I can do it for free once because I already bought Ep. II.
Just tubmail me and it shall be done, I will edit this post when an offer has been accepted.
Provide an avatar or let me write some male reproductive organmongler ****. (view post) |
02/17/2009 | |
REAL Friend Contest for up to 11BPLong Live the Victorious People’s War of World Libertarian Revolution for the Emancipation of the Exploited Majority!
Log in to see images! (view post) |
02/17/2009 | |
Who Needs Free BP? Flamebate Peen Contest, 4 BP Up for Grabs!Long Live the Victorious War of World Libertarian Revolution for the Emancipation of the Exploited Majority!
Log in to see images! (view post) |
02/17/2009 | |
All Libertarian Libertarian Nick KlanPretty liberal on the nick thing just that it isn’t Hillary CLinton or sum evil name. (view post) |
02/16/2009 | |
All Libertarian Libertarian Nick KlanLog in to see images!
My Klan is only for Libertarians with Libertarian Nicks. So if you’re a Libertarian and your nick is TH0maz jeffers, RONZ PUALZ, Joan D’arc or Ayn Randorz. You are free to join if these conditions are met you will be approved.
Now are there any? That is the big question….
Members:
John Stossel Milton Friedman Ludwig Von Mises Murray Rothbard (view post) |
02/16/2009 | |
Another last post wins 3BP.hi there (view post) |
02/16/2009 | |
I do not understand what auction abuse means anymoreyeah I agree remove junk and but a maximum price on low tier .moars. (view post) |
02/16/2009 |