­I feel that those posts were completely civil and constructive, there shouldn’t have been any bans at all. This game asks if you’re easily offended, then goes on to say ‘fine upstanding member of society’ and ‘fabulous person’ (among other things) over the course of the game; Yet when someone posts a thread about swastikas, anyone who posted on topic caught a ban. If it really offends you, that sucks, but you saw the thread title before even clicking on it. That’s on you.

So let’s get into another scenario, let’s just say “Okay, fine, but there were no swastikas in the game’s script.” You’re probably right on that one, but what if I wanted to make a thread that asked people to post whenever the game’s script said ‘fine upstanding member of society’, would that be acceptable? It’s game discussion, right?

Whatever, this is tl;dr anyways.

If a mod has to ban three different people in a row, said mod should really think twice about if giving out bans at all is the right idea.

Topic should have been moved to GRP minimum.

Catt although Posted:

There are many “posts” on the game forums that would be against the rules in CD.

I think I’m done replying on this subject. If you can’t understand that CD has different rules than the site as a whole I don’t know what to tell you.

Sergeant Cid Posted:

Any potential NSFW threads in CD are supposed to be properly labeled as such.

Chuck Diesel Posted:

­Okay, so you’re saying that since a thread title says ‘Swastikas’, since it’s not labeled as NSFW, it’s supposed to be some big mystery? “Oh god guys, I wonder what’s in the thread?”

And how are pictures of swastikas NSFW? Open a history book. Schools never sent home permission slips to make sure kids were allowed to see Nazi death camps in history books.

Actually labeling a thread NSFW doesn’t exempt you from site rules. Only in certain situations, like contests.

Chuck Diesel Posted:

­Maybe the thread was about world history? Log in to see images!

I didn’t read the thread in question. Are you saying that a legitimate discussion was interrupted?

Someone should misinterpret the first amendment.

One of the users got banned for posting a picture of a building in the shape of a swastika and linking the related news article. Just putting that out there.

Funnily enough, whilst perusing these Civil-Discussion-no-swastika-forums, I am confronted by a Forumwarz Community Ad on every page that’s positively full to the brim with the things. Make of it what you will…

Joe Torpedo Posted:

Funnily enough, whilst perusing these Civil-Discussion-no-swastika-forums, I am confronted by a Forumwarz Community Ad on every page that’s positively full to the brim with the things. Make of it what you will…

That was an honest mistake one of the mods made, should be fixed now.