Celerysteve Posted:

Permaban Skyman747. Nice knowin’ you Skyman.

inb4 cid permas me and comes up with some bull**** reason to justify it.

duca Posted:

Please, tell us all how you’ve figured out that Bronnih is really an illegal alt of Fingerz. I would very much like to know how she pulled off such an elaborate task for so long. THANKS Log in to see images!

Where did I say she is confirmed as an illegal alt of Fingerz? I never said that. She did.

And if you claim to be another player, and there’s a ‘coincidence’ of both accounts using the same IP, then it falls on that player to explain it further.

I also find it interesting that you’re not ‘outraged’ at fire hyp’s identical ban. Why is that?

So, is the ban bull**** or is the duration bull****? Just so I know what you’re ****ing about, specifically.

Sergeant Cid Posted:

Where did I say she is confirmed as an illegal alt of Fingerz? I never said that. She did.

And if you claim to be another player, and there’s a ‘coincidence’ of both accounts using the same IP, then it falls on that player to explain it further.

I also find it interesting that you’re not ‘outraged’ at fire hyp’s identical ban. Why is that?

You’re logic for the 5 month ban is that she is a illegal alt of Fingerz and should have the same ban length as a result. But you are saying right now that she isn’t a illegal of Fingerz, which means that she should in reality have a ban length that is on par with the one that Evil Trout and Tubsweetie gave Skyman. So which is it, man? Cause I’m real confused.

As for the fire dude, for all I know he is actually an illegal of Fingerz. I have no experience with the user and can bring up no evidence to the contrary. However, I have spoken with Bronnih on several occasions and can quite happily confirm that she is in fact a young British girl. So I feel confident in saying that she is not an illegal.

Thank you Cid for listening to our logic regarding the ridculous length of bronnihs ban. 5 months is a bit of a stretch, eh? We appreciate you listening to logic even though you’re being a ****ing woman's genitals about it. Log in to see images!

duca Posted:

You’re logic for the 5 month ban is that she is a illegal alt of Fingerz and should have the same ban length as a result. But you are saying right now that she isn’t a illegal of Fingerz, which means that she should in reality have a ban length that is on par with the one that Evil Trout and Tubsweetie gave Skyman. So which is it, man? Cause I’m real confused.

As for the fire dude, for all I know he is actually an illegal of Fingerz. I have no experience with the user and can bring up no evidence to the contrary. However, I have spoken with Bronnih on several occasions and can quite happily confirm that she is in fact a young British girl. So I feel confident in saying that she is not an illegal.

I didn’t say she was an illegal alt. I also never said she wasn’t; that’s an error of presumption on your part. There’s evidence that supports both possibilities.

As far as talking to Bronnih, have you ever talked to Fingerz? That would be useful info as well.

In any event, the ‘full length’ is temporarily commuted. It’s a mighty suspicious coincidence that Bronnih makes the claim, and then there’s non-proxy IP evidence to support it. I’m more than willing to listen to her explanation.

duca Posted:

Thank you Cid for listening to our logic regarding the ridculous length of bronnihs ban. 5 months is a bit of a stretch, eh? We appreciate you listening to logic even though you’re being a ****ing woman's genitals about it. Log in to see images!

That’s ‘Mr. ****ing woman's genitals’ to you, missy.

It got the point across. And technically, she’s a ‘repeat offender’, since she’s done it before.

All **** aside, I want to hear from her about this IP issue.

Sergeant Cid Posted:

I don’t play favorites

well we do. and it shouldn’t surprise you Log in to see images!

Bandaney Posted:

well we do. and it shouldn’t surprise you Log in to see images!

I know you do. And that’s expected within the community. I’ve had to ban people I really like, but that’s the **** that comes with the job. But if someone wants to critique a banning, then I still have to look at it from as unbiased a point of view as I can muster.

The point of the original ban was to drive a point home. This “HURP DURP I’M SO-AND-SO BANNED GUY” is more than a little annoying. We’re not going to chase down every possible piece of evidence to verify/disprove claims. I know it’s normal to push & test those boundaries.

But, ****, people. You’re more creative than that. Why rehash the old hackneyed ****? If you’re going for ‘the lulz’, at least bring something fresh to the table.

Sergeant Cid Posted:

Yeah, but you’re pure awesome. That’s totally different.

so pure awesome is posting pointless quips in drama-laced threads that conspicuously lay out my apathy?

Lessons people. Lessons!

Yes it’s pick on Cid night. This is how we tell you.