You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
![]() |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This came up in Was’ thread, but I feel its worth hashing out on its own.
There are awful, annoying, terrible posters in RP, and many of us feel that they keep a lot of the people that actually contribute comedy to this site away. A few mods (not just Nicco) have expressed frustration over not being able to ban these people from the boards without banning them from everything else. I agree that if you really want to play dom or w/e you shouldn’t be excluded from that because you were annoying in flamebate, but I also don’t feel that I should have to put up with your **** just because you might want to play dom too.
I see it this way, I don’t purposely **** up the parts of the game you use, don’t come **** up the parts of the game I use. We have rules against abuse in every other part of the game, and bans that make sense when people break those rules. However, getting banned from everything for being an idiot in flamebate doesn’t seem like an appropriate punishment.
I feel that a separate ban for the boards is needed. It really makes sense to separate gameplay and community bans, if not to keep the boards cleaner and more conducive to entertaining threads, than to highlight the difference in severity between gameplay abuse and forum retardation. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/10/2009 5:00AM | View Indiana Jonas's Profile | # | ||||||
|
seconded |
||||||
Posted On: 07/10/2009 5:38AM | View Alfred Nonymous's Profile | # | ||||||
Thirded
Either this, or make bans apply only to characters, and not whole accounts. Ardent edited this message on 07/10/2009 9:21AM |
|||||||
Posted On: 07/10/2009 9:20AM | View Ardent's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Ban them to post only in Meme factory. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/10/2009 9:43AM | View 1337xxxxxxxxxlol...'s Profile | # | ||||||
|
forumwarz rulles Posted:
If a mod wishes he can ban people just for “****ing them off” |
||||||
Posted On: 07/10/2009 9:45AM | View ANGRY HOBO's Profile | # | ||||||
|
lord knows it’s happened to me. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/10/2009 9:47AM | View Fortunato's Profile | # | ||||||
Absolutely not. If you’re a ‘tard and cannot keep from ****-posting all over CD, then you deserve the ban. Can’t play dom for a few days? That’s the consequence of being a ‘tard where the rest of us have to see it. |
|||||||
Posted On: 07/10/2009 9:48AM | View Sneaky27's Profile | # | ||||||
|
This debate is exposing people who don’t understand the difference between trolling (artform) and spamming, “**** posting,” and just making a joke. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/10/2009 9:57AM | View 1337xxxxxxxxxlol...'s Profile | # | ||||||
I think it’s a good idea. Mods can be more liberal with their bans, too, since the consequences aren’t as harsh. Maybe even combine it with the voting system already in place, so posts with enough downvotes are marked for review and a mod can decide if it really is a **** post and ban the poster from posting in flamebate. And, people who make good posts can be rewarded by having more weight when they downvote a post. Good or bad idea? |
|||||||
Posted On: 07/10/2009 11:15PM | View Necrosaro's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Signed Log in to see images!
ofc, you already knew that cause of the other thread but still. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/10/2009 11:26PM | View Fingerz's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Signed, upvoted and tenthded? Then people can walk the line and be jerks without having to fear the hammer. Likely my only good thread was the one I got banned for and I’d try walking the line some more if I could still play…
And were clever… |
||||||
Posted On: 07/10/2009 11:39PM | View Dunatis's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Lets take this thread for the basic idea of making a ban that only affects flamebate and i like the idea. I would like to see it not affect klan forums though, people use those for DOM.
The rest of it just sounds like the usual whining.
Mod Edit: This part isn’t contributing anything to the thread, and is an obvious attempt to derail a serious discussion. Take it to the appropriate forum if you want to argue that point. – Cid |
||||||
Posted On: 07/11/2009 12:48AM | View Nailbomb's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Nailbomb Posted:
The usual whining you’ve witnessed in 3 months here? Considering the scope of the complaints and the history we’re using to argue our points, I feel it would best serve you to not try bring precedent into this. Indiana Jonas edited this message on 07/11/2009 1:18AM |
||||||
Posted On: 07/11/2009 1:18AM | View Indiana Jonas's Profile | # | ||||||
Yes, yes, agreed. |
|||||||
Posted On: 07/11/2009 1:21AM | View Kilroy's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Hobart Bliggity Posted:
and your still not changing by the sounds of it. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/11/2009 1:23AM | View Nailbomb's Profile | # | ||||||
|
signed. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/11/2009 1:30AM | View AntiRules187's Profile | # | ||||||
Hobart Bliggity Posted:
It’s not a bad idea… I gather that the full ban should be still usable, i.e. for illegal alt users, people trying to hack/crash the site, and serial Flamebate offenders, amirite? |
|||||||
Posted On: 07/11/2009 1:35AM | View Amy Rose's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Amy Rose Posted:
I would bumume so. And I’d be all for it (And using it) if something like this were to happen. dobnits edited this message on 07/11/2009 2:14AM |
||||||
Posted On: 07/11/2009 2:13AM | View dobnits's Profile | # | ||||||
|
This feature can’t come in soon enough. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/11/2009 2:49AM | View BidSquid's Profile | # | ||||||
|
I’m kind of bummed that we haven’t heard boo from either ET or JB on this topic yet Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 07/11/2009 12:27PM | View Fingerz's Profile | # | ||||||