I AM NOT SAYING THIS NEEDS TO BE DONE RIGHT AWAY. I AM NOT SAYING THIS IS IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO PUT BEFORE BUG FIXES. IT IS A MINOR THING THAT WILL ONLY INCREASE THE USERS ABILITY TO FIND INFORMATION

If it’s not there already, I think the Wiki needs a Make-over. Sure this has been said a few times, but there are a lot of option that could be added to make it better. Anyway, post suggestions here/comments.

MeatLoafFan Posted:

Why? It’s intended as an aid to the game substantiated with excessive amounts of information. It should be basic and uncomplicated.

Yes, a talk page would be nice to add, along with support for a Table of Contents (such as the wikipedia _TOC_ command), however all of this is just bells and whistles that are completely unnecessary.

What more do you want?

Edit: Now, if we had a rough version of a to-do list, we could simply check this to see if we should make a thread bawwing about it, or just check it…

Flamebate didn’t need a make-over. All that was added was bells and whistles, so why not improve the wiki?

Samildanach Posted:

So, what you’re saying is, you don’t have any ideas for specific improvements you want made, and after the way players ****ed at him for changing Flamebate, you’d like him to do something similar to the wiki too?

Please say who ****ed that Flamebate needed a make-over, because I seen none of it.

CrinkzPipe Posted:

Please say who ****ed that Flamebate needed a make-over, because I seen none of it.

Try reading the post. ET changed FB. Hordes of the bumhurt complained about the new Flamebate and how it didn’t need changing as soon as he did it.

Now, you’re popping up to say that, while you have no specific ideas for how to improve the wiki, ET should just make some undefined changes, and your justification is that, well, he changed FB. How do you expect this to get any better of a response from the community?