You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
preppy-bacon's Flamebate Posts
View preppy-bacon's Profile
Search Results | ||
---|---|---|
![]() |
Trying to understand DominationSome players just want to mess as much as they want after noticing that they won’t be able to win anyway. Some of them also want to ascertain that no player will have higher minimum of scoops, though I doubt that’s the case if they don’t have any scoops.
Simply wait it out, and prepare for the next domination – you might get more lucky with players on the next try. (view post) |
02/05/2011 |
![]() |
Better web spiders?I know something similar had already been suggested, but how about these ideas: 1. Spider that has a rather low (5%~10%) chance of finding two .moar parts, but if it finds two, none of these are rare. 2. Spider with a chance (5% for each copy of this .moar part – 5% if you already have one, 10% if you have two, etc. up to 50%) to choose another part of this file at random (meaning we are very likely to get another part that we already have, but it’s still a second chance). 3. Spider that has a chance (25%~30%) of finding a low amount of flezz instead/in addition to .moar parts (whichever is more balanced). 4. Spider that has a chance (20%~25%) to give us a buff after each thread in addition, with buffs being clbum-specific. 5. Spider that only finds .moar parts of a file we chose (if it’s on this forum), but it has a chance (25%~50%) to “consume” one part of this file at random.
Also, when it comes to getting additional web spiders, I think that at least one should be sold in each chapter’s shop, and the rest would be obtainable from either Ppown Shoppe (at random), or quests given by a new sTalk contact through missions (it would be even better if web spider obtainable through quest was clbum-dependent, with missions varying for different clbumes). (view post) |
01/30/2011 |