You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
narth's Flamebate Posts
View narth's ProfileSearch Results | ||
---|---|---|
@ACTUAL GIRLSobgyn lol? (view post) |
04/29/2008 | |
atheismI was gonna post a response, then I realised I’d be responding to you out of sympathy. Then I figured that might be your angle. (view post) |
04/23/2008 | |
atheismDunno, I think it’s more some very bored posters and some people taking it IC.
I mean. Well done. Masterfully played. Bet you’re all so proud.
BirdofPrey Posted:
yep. It was a lame troll too. I was hoping by supporting the underdog you might have to do something clever rather than copypasta though. Sadly. Fail. (view post) |
04/23/2008 | |
atheismBirdofPrey Posted:
Velveteen Posted:
No, because the dog would be more likely to break things than bumemble more parts once 2 parts go together.
The anology is flawed, because BoP is a lazy troll and can’t even copypasta good arguements. Seriously, you can do better than that christfabulous person, if you’re gonna copy something, don’t make it a flawed anology.
Even if the parts didn’t fall apart afterwards he’d never make a house because he’s just hammering. Whereas evolution is more, if he gets two parts right they will not fall from subsequent hammering. Also once a few random nails are in, a builder who can dig appears, and as more happens more people appear to do the other roles. Also if it’s done wrong, the bits dissbumemble, good as new after a while. And the bits last a stupidly long time, perhaps even foreevr. Also there’s potentially millions of these scenarios, with different dogs and builders.
The old analogy didn’t reflect the terms evolution works on. It’s like saying “your theory is wrong, because if I change it a bit it makes no sense”. Well no ****.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tame_Silver_Fox Evolution may not be the cause of our existance, but it’s been proven. And for a lengthy process, I’d say taking 50 years is pretty good. (view post) |
04/23/2008 | |
Obama will enslave the white race!BRB_GOINGTOTHEMOON Posted: |
04/23/2008 | |
Emo lynching at Mexico last Friday (srsly)d000dl3s Posted:
Your town needs somewhere for them to go. Like a skatepark, with lots of benches, that tends to redirect them. The only time it doesn’t work is when chavs set up there and drive them away. If you direct a few of their friends there (and a few will skate), they follow.
Problem is that chavs are not the solution to this issue, they’re a worse problem to displace it. Yes, I don’t get goths, and the ones that do have poor personal hygiene might be a pain. However trust me here. At least they aren’t intimidating. The thing about chavs is not that they are “hard” they aren’t. It’s that they’re aggressive, and people would rather avoid conflict, that they move in large packs, and often carry weapons. So it’s not a chav, but 20-30 of them, with a dozen knives and a couple of bike chains and a small chance of a gun. No person in their right mind ****s with a chav, not because he’s handy, no, it’s easier to just walk round them then fight them, risking a weapon being pulled and 8 of them piling in.
Funnily enough chavs drive off business too.
Oh and I haven’t met a goth over school age who didn’t have a job or wasn’t in full time university education.
Of course I would say that, I don’t own a leather jacket or spikes, I wash if I’m going any futher than the corner shop on a given day, and I’m definatley not full of loathing and angst. But I’d probably still be the target of your bull**** wannabe vigilante raids if I were a few years younger. I still get **** from chavs *just* because of my hair (which is LOOOOOOOOOOONNNNG and curly)(even when I was 13 and dressed like a chav, I didn’t get stick from goths for my appearance, they just let me be).
On top of this the “alternative” music society in the uni I went to is the most open clique ever. Doesn’t matter who you are, your gender, sexuality, race, clothes, you turn up and treat everyone with respect and you get the same.
I’ve not noticed that from chavs. Hell, they use “gay” as an insult and make on the spot judgements based purely in appearance.
I’m sure your heart is in the right place, but just think about it. You aren’t making things better, and there’s probably a better solution if you pester the local council. Just think, £10K on a skate park and everyone is happy. You can chill with your friends instead of harbuming kids. The kids get somewhere to hang out, and the rest of town get to be happy. (view post) |
04/23/2008 | |
im cofnused an wnoderingThat “woman is the dominant sex” is basically a way of saying “we want all the good stuff that comes with equality, but we want to keep the perks of inequality”. Or simply “i’m a whore, and a yhypocrite and at some point I feel afoul of some woman's genitals who used me and now I blame all men for the combined results of this man’s actions and my stupidity” or perhaps “I just want it both ways”.
AMIRITE? (view post) |
04/23/2008 | |
atheismI think BoP’s original troll post was pretty much flawed. As it’s argueable that cooperation and stability offered by society benifit us all. And that certain rules are required for them to work. If everyone were to adhere to certain ethics life would be better for everyone. Not everyone does, but even then, you get benifit from them. Things like empathy give us concience anyway, and it exists for a reason. Largely, it evolved and is the majority because it helps you breed and prosper.
Anyway what I’m getting at, is that in the absence of a god and supreme moral judgement, actions can still have values, it’s just the value can adjust to reflect it’s actual effect given current conditions. Rather than set in stone values coming from the 3rd edit of a translated edited text written thousands of years ago.
It’s my beleif that if a god does exist, he’d be aware that certain values would change.
But yet, meanwhile there’s still core values and rules (most of the commandments hold up well for example and it could be argued 9 of the 10 are pretty good cornerstones of a stable society, though obviously some intellegence in their use is good. “honour thy mother and father, but obviously if they try to beat you to death, you can turn them in to the police”Log in to see images! that benifit us. Stableon society reaps benifits in confidence and so growth, general happiness due to absence of shocks and more. And we all live happier knowing some things are stable.
These hold up, god or none.
I’m agnostic, just because I’m not sure and I’m not sure it matters. As you can see, I reckon that a benevolent god would set rules and judge based on what’s best for their people, they’d be flexible, and so the best action is to think what is the best move to make, not what you won’t get shouted at.
Now I could counter argue that being able to hide behind what god said (well, after a few edits, and given different cirgreat timesstances) allows people to do evil things…. but moral bankruptcy among many christians is a different story. (view post) |
04/22/2008 | |
Laying the final straw.The strongest force is irony. Irony is god. Why are we alive? Why does the universe exist? It’s improbable, it shouldn’t exist, therefore it does. God is just a product of everything being a joke. (view post) |
04/21/2008 | |
PL3333ZE GoD, TR0LL TH1S SITE UNTIL IT BLEEEDS!Lady Lurex Posted:
Yanks didn’t win WW2 anyway. If they’d not helped Hitler would have fallen and England would have held (don’t talk about supplies, you got to sell stuff to us it wasn’t a sacrifice or anything), there’d have been no Europe until the USSR fell, just England and Russia, all the way to the rest of Asia. So yeah, the Yanks are to blame for France still being there. Good work. (view post) |
04/21/2008 | |
PANTS GETS SILLY PEOPLE TO DELETE THEIR KLANSEchuu Posted:
He joined, on the condition he could be made officer.
We checked and realised that officers can’t be removed by officer, than made everyone an officer and let him in. Because PANTS has a reputation for hijynx. Next to schmoozing and BS at a level, that no sarcasm intended, IS an artform.
For the rest of you though…. Log in to see images! (view post) |
04/21/2008 | |
Dont be Vague.He’ll always be in the shadow of thatcher’s hagina. (view post) |
04/16/2008 | |
Add me as a friend if you want my nudes :)handofg0d Posted:
Now if she was to flash us, and the police didn’t turn up and arrest us for it, I’m sure she’d get friended out of gratitude. Though that would make her the biggest whore on forumwarz. Though that’s also a whore badge of honour.
As it is, she’s just a wannabe, and her photoshop airbrushed fakes don’t wash. (view post) |
04/16/2008 | |
TEAM SHORTBUS RULES... AGAIN!AAHZ Posted: |
04/16/2008 | |
I hate TSB!TSB are okay really. Don’t beleive some of the stuff being posted, but they’re generally funnier, more likeable and NOT BORING AND ****E LIKE THE PEOPLE WHO SO CLEARLY TRY TO HATE THEM. Also most of them would be bitter tsb rejects anyway.
They seem really nice.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=X7oQYKUL7ys&feature=related
They say yes. (view post) |
04/13/2008 | |
POST YR FACEMilo Posted: |
04/08/2008 | |
Everyone say hi to our new mod: SUX2BUSux2BU Posted:
That’s the hottest image I’ve seen in any of your posts too. (view post) |
04/04/2008 | |
PH just came into my home town!!!Nikki Six. DID die. So actually that was kinda fail.
Also, skankysade, “I know you are, but what am I?” is pretty 5 year old ish. I bet your parents are proud.*
* Afterall you must have been dropped on your head a lot as a child and you can still breathe unaided. Just.
Also, I bet you guys find all sorts of undernourished women hot right? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starvation (view post) |
04/04/2008 | |
POST YR FACEcurufeanor Posted: |
04/04/2008 | |
Some jackbum changed my avatar, how do I put it back?Terag Runner Posted:
It’s one brownie point.
It costs 2 to change someone else’s and 3 anonymously.
this means it costs them a lot more. (view post) |
04/02/2008 |