Samildanach's Flamebate Posts

the tam emotes are pointless and have no utility so no one is going to use them anyway

Generic Racist Posted:

if you are willing to pay $0 dollars or whatever it costs to trime a third of a .gif in order to turn a pointless emote into one that people might use i ain’t gonna stop you bro

Fixed. Who the hell buys BP when people give it away for free? And it’s not like I’m a retard investing ten bucks or w/e so my klanmates have 2 stupid icons to choose from when trying to emotespam. Log in to see images! (view post)

SUGGESTION to improve the quality fo the Flamebate experience by 563%

was Posted:

I wish you would stop suggesting this. I could be wrong about the following, but until you click “Post it!” emoticons are considered text. Any attempt at limiting emoticons will have to decrease the number of allowed characters in a post. What do you suggest? Allowing no more than 30 characters in a single post?

... you realize that the engine already has to do some level of parse-and-check at post time to limit “excess” image links, right? Having it also check for “excess” emotes wouldn’t be that much harder.

That said, for no real defensible reason, I dislike the idea of a hard limit on emotes.

SUGGESTION to improve the quality fo the Flamebate experience by 563%

Adapt Posted:

So just because fingerz made the thread it becomes a battle against her being supposedly hypocritical? Um sorry but since when was “this is a bad idea because you do the same thing you want fixed” NOT a logical fallacy?

It’s not a bad idea because it’s something fingerz does too. It’s a bad idea, and fingerz does exactly the same thing too.

Every time there’s a new restriction on FB, people **** about ruining the “fun.” And every time they get annoyed by something someone considers “fun” on FB, they **** about wanting new rules to prevent it. Occasionally, they might need other people to point out how full of **** they are.

In this case, there are multiple easy client-side solutions that could allow users who find Kaiser posts annoying to avoid them, but instead, we get threads demanding new code and/or new rules and/or exacerbating the situation to “prove” how terrible it is.

The line between CD and RP is starting to blur.

My .sig seems hideously appropriate for this occasion.

Virus Infected Democrat crying about Gun Control Legislation while ****ing homicide girls zoe

Time-for-me-to-sleep bump. 10 hours remain, give or take.

SUGGESTION to improve the quality fo the Flamebate experience by 563%

LROSENBERG1996 Posted:

The person who programmed the forum could write a function to auto-ban someone when that person makes a post containing a thousand emoticons or several kbytes of whitespace.

... or it could reject those posts in the first place? Just saying.

Also, since there’s now a scroll on posts in RP, meh.

Also also, since there’s adblock and RIP and a number of other common add-ons you can use to block the images, on top of the built-in option to turn images to links on top of the simple option of turning off graphics in your browser… Don’t care.

And as others have mentioned, Fingerz is not so much in a glbum house, as one of spun sugar.

Macolytes vs the Firefox Faithful

A-Sat Posted:

Koan? Are you a ****ing Buddhist? Please say no so i don’t have to get you exorcized…

I ****ed a Buddhist once, but I am not a ****ing Buddhist.

I am a pantheistic solipsist.

ban celeryfabulous person

SIG-ENABLING MOCK-CONGLER Posted:

3 to 1, i think its safe to say celery has 9 alts Log in to see images!

Fixed.

(view post)

About purchasing multiple cards

Sarcasm Inc Posted:

Yes to being able to put up multiple scoops at once. I don’t mind purchasing the cards individually, just as long as I don’t have to choose scoops every time.

I’d also kind of like to be able to “trade 4” for simplicity, next to the usual trade.

Overall, I concur, choosing one at a time is inherently different from choosing a third of all options. If nothing else, there are occasions when you’re presented with 3 cards that aren’t immediately useful and have to choose the least worst, and occasions where you would gladly take two of the three options presented, but have to pick one. Batch listing removes those aspects, making a very different game.

Spock used to be Spock

Spock should have sung a song about the hobbit.

Spock-Spock, that is, not Sylar-Spock. That would be creepy.

Oh, also, posting embedded Spock. LOL. Etc.

Log in to see images! (view post)