You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
Possibly a Cabbage's Flamebate Posts
View Possibly a Cabbage's Profile
Search Results | ||
---|---|---|
![]() |
A truce?Raepdog Posted:
Wait. Let me get this straight. In your particular bizarro world, this particular image is entirely unacceptable:
Log in to see images!
But this is entirely acceptable?
Log in to see images!
Is this acceptable? Log in to see images!
How about this? Log in to see images!
Personally, I think all of those images are equally acceptable. If we allow one of them, we should allow any of them. But more to the point, if I start spamming the picture of the ostrich 50 times, that’s nonconstructive spam and really shouldn’t be allowed. That’s not to say I shouldn’t be allowed to post the ostrich (it’s a very attractive ostrich), but saying that there’s some validity to posting that ostrich 50 times since I can post it once? That’s absolutely asinine.
Limiting the number of images is really the only solution (for RP.) There’s really nothing wrong with dragons, done in moderation. Nor is there anything wrong with gay porn, done in moderation. The problem is “lack of moderation.” (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?Pony Express Posted:
What was Fonzie like?
Log in to see images!
Let’s be like Fonzie. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?Raepdog Posted:
Take an image, post it once. That’s not spam (usually). Take anything, post it fifty times? It’s spam. If the problem is spam, limit the number of images.
I already explained that the image limit shouldn’t apply in non-RP. The non-RP forums are fine. The only forums on flamebate that suck are the RP ones. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?There’s sort of an unspoken bumumption of a lot of people here that “good threads are being ruined by dragons”. Can someone give me any sort of example of a good thread getting ruined by dragons? I’d really like to see this for myself. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?Wylin Posted:
QFT, yo.
Plus “limit the image not the number of images” is one of the stupidest things I’ve ever seen on Flamebate, and that’s no small feat. One image, by itself, is seldom annoying unless it depicts something that is in and of itself objectionable. Five images, by themselves, are almost never annoying unless they depict something that is in and of itself objectionable. FIFTY GODDAMN PICTURES OF THE SAME THING? That’s annoying no matter what it’s an image of. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?Raepdog Posted:
I post dragons to troll people like you, because it’s ****ing hilarious watching you get all bent out of shape about it. Could you dance for me some more? Perhaps become blinded by rage? I’d really appreciate that. Thanks. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?Raepdog Posted:
You care, and that’s funny, and sad, but mostly funny. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?Go ahead and post 5 gay porn images. Go ahead and post 5 dragons. Neither are particularly annoying.
Personally, I look forward to a golden age where people no longer force me to scroll past many, many, many instances of an image that I don’t feel like adblocking.
Oh, and if you want to post something that’s not just “random imagespam” that would be pretty cool. A rule I’d personally like to see built into the flamebate software is “you cannot post an image or youtube video in a post that contains no other text”. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A Forumbuildr Etiquette QuestionThanks. Being -5ed in the first hour or so of submissions is really disappointing when it’s a joke that you’ve been tossing around in your head for a week or so. Has there ever been any talk of removing the “-5 or less and you’re gone” thing for the first 24 hours or so of submissions? It’s really very intimidating to people who are just dipping their toes in the forumbuildr waters to see what it’s like. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A Forumbuildr Etiquette QuestionIs it poor form to submit the same concept for the weekly forum more than once, if it doesn’t win the first time around? I’ve had a few ideas that I personally thought were fairly witty (“Fantasy Fantasy Football” and “Hail Heiress!”, for example) that ended up being quickly downvoted to -5 before, I suspect, a lot of people got the chance to see them.
Is it bad form to take an idea for a forum that was previously rejected and resubmit it, in hopes that it would get a better response the second time? (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
Dragcave.Net PARTYI’m wondering if anybody has a suggestion. I’m running out of common dragons to raise, and I don’t want a ton of duplicates. There are a lot of types of dragons I haven’t been able to get my hands on, I wonder if anybody has any suggestions as to how to get my hands on them?
I’m currently looking for: Stone and two-headed in addition to weirder things like silver, gold, paper, dinos, chickens, etc.
Is breeding the only way to get a bunch of weird dragons? (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?DesdiPhoenix Posted:
It also doesn’t keep me from spamming your thread with Hamlet (which you can’t Adblock). Your point? It’s better than nothing.
The dragons were less of a problem than the gratuitous pornspam, in my opinion. The dragons were starting to wane, were it not for people constantly baiting the dragon posters by calling attention to them. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?DesdiPhoenix Posted:
How often are people going to want to post more than five dragons in a single post? You can only have 5 eggs at a time (and four hatchlings, true), but I don’t see how this changes dragons at all. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
Acid Flux's Country Kitchen and Flea Market Guest Book Contest! WIN UP TO 15 BP! NO PURCHASE NECESSARY
|
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?Evil Trout Posted:
Suggestion:
Make the limit 5 images per post in RP and have no limit in non-RP. If someone has a legitimate reason for posting a lot of images in non-RP, that’s fine. If people spam or otherwise behave like jerks in non-RP, ban them like you do currently.
Edit: It’s not as though image spam is actually any sort of a problem in non-RP these days. No need to punish non-RP folks for the jerkery that goes on in the RP forums. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?Possibly a Cabbage Posted:
I’m not entirely non-serious… (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?Wylin Posted:
I think we can make it work if we just look at great timesulative extremity. If you post one particularly extreme image somewhere, that may be worth a ban. But if you post one not-particularly-extreme image IN EVERY FREAKIN’ THREAD ON FLAMEBATE, that might add up to count as one extreme graphic. Just integrate over the whole curve to get total extremity, and have goatse and suchlike be delta-functions.
So maybe the rule should be “Don’t post extreme graphics or graphics extremely”. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?MC Banhammer Posted:
At the risk of being pedantic, what if you have an alt with nudity in its avatar that only ever posts in RP forums. Would that be allowed? (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?Acid Flux Posted:
Requesting the creation of a “Ruined It For Everyone” peen for anybody who gets ET to place tighter restrictions on posting in RP. It’s the ultimate troll. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |
![]() |
A truce?Evil Trout Posted:
This place would be a lot better if we just banned posting. (view post) |
02/11/2009 |