OrsonScottCard Posted:

and confused by the inclusion of Jamaican and gay as racial groups

Wait, what. That was what was edited away?

Ok, dude’s either trolling or beyond help.

Just for interest though, there are evolutionarily plausible ways to explain homosexuality, despite it seeming to be counter-productive from a reproductive perspective. Whilst it would be determined in any give individual by a collection of genes and environmental factors rather than any one specific “gay gene” or particular formative experience, there may be (for example) genes that predispose the bearer towards increased attraction towards men; the Darwinian benefit of increased fecundity in females ‘paying for’ the decreased reproductive output of men that carry the same gene.

Also Jamaica is a country. Whilst the people of that country probably represent a group that breed within themselves to a greater degree than with those outside, I some how doubt that state of affairs would have persisted over a long enough period of generations for any significant genetic separation to have occurred. What with how, indigenous peoples aside, it’s only been colonised in about the last 500 years.